Judgements by Poojitha Raam Vinay

Aforesaid appeal by revenue for Assessment Year (AY) 2014-15 arises out of the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-21.

The present appeal has been preferred by the Revenue against the order dated 12.11.2018 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [hereinafter referred to as the CIT(A)] relevant to assessment year 2006-07.

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A) – 15, Kolkata dated 30.07.2019 whereby he confirmed the penalty of Rs.4,58,376/- imposed by the AO u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income tax Act, 1961.

Aforesaid appeals by assessee for Assessment Years (AY) 2009-10 to 2012-13.

Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2013-14 arises out of the order of learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-10, Mumbai [CIT(A)], dated 11/12/2019 in the matter of assessment framed by learned Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 143(3

Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2016-17 arises out of the order learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-49, Mumbai [CIT(A)], dated 24/01/2020 in the matter of assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 143(3) r.w.s

These two appeals are filed by the Revenue against order dated31.05.2016 passed by CIT(A)-23, New Delhi for Assessment Year 2012-13 and 2013-14.

These two appeals are filed by the Revenue against order dated 31.05.2016 passed by CIT(A)-23, New Delhi for Assessment Year 2012-13 and order dated 30.05.2017 passed by CIT(A)-24, New Delhi for Assessment Year 2013-14.

The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 26.09.2017 of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-37, New Delhi, (hereinafter referred to ‘CIT(A)’) for the Assessment Year 2013-14.

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 03.12.2019 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-8, New Delhi relating to Assessment Year 2011-12.