Income Tax Judgements

M/s Dakshina Kannada Koota Brahmanara Mitra Mandali, Bangalore DDIT, Bangalore

Guest 09 March 2021 at 17:16

This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against CIT(A)’s order dated 16.09.2015. The relevant assessment year is 2011-2012.

Posted in Income Tax | 129 Views

M/s Synergia Consultants Private Limited , Bangalore Deputy Commissioner of Income TAx Circle-6(1)(2), Bangalore Details

Guest 09 March 2021 at 17:16

This appeal by the assessee is against the order dated 19.01.2018of the CIT(Appeals), Bengaluru-6, Bengaluru, for the assessment year 2014-15.

Posted in Income Tax | 139 Views

Webex Communications India Private Limited, Bangalore Asst.C.I.T., Bangalore

Guest 09 March 2021 at 17:16

This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the assessment order dated 29.01.2016 passed u/s143(3) r.w.s. 144C(1) of the I.T.Act, 1961. The relevant assessment year is 2011-2012.

Posted in Income Tax | 89 Views

Shri K K Mahesh , Davangere Income Tax Officer Ward-2 , Davangere

Guest 09 March 2021 at 17:16

Both the appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the orders passed by Ld. CIT(A), Davanagere for the assessment years 2009-10 & 2012-13, wherein the Ld. CIT(A) has confirmed a penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act,1961 ['the A

Posted in Income Tax | 173 Views

Section 54/54F uses the expression "a residential house" and not "a residential unit", says ITAT

Guest 09 March 2021 at 17:16

The appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 29-11-2019 passed by Ld CIT(A)-7, Bengaluru and it relates tothe assessment year 2015-16. The solitary issue urged in this appealis whether the Ld CIT(A) was justified in rejecting

Posted in Income Tax | 156 Views

Property which constitutes one single house with two different door nos, still counts as one property, says ITAT

Guest 09 March 2021 at 17:16

The appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 29-11-2019 passed by Ld CIT(A)-7, Bengaluru and it relates to the assessment year 2015-16. The solitary issue urged in this appeal is whether the Ld CIT(A) was justified in rejectin

Posted in Income Tax | 170 Views

Assessee is at liberty to recall order if there is non-acceptance of assessee's proposal to opt for VSVS,2020

Guest 06 March 2021 at 17:38

This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of Ld. CIT(A), Burdwan dated 08.03.2019 for AY 2015-16.

Posted in Income Tax | 104 Views

Radhika Industrial Investment Ltd., Kolkata I.T.O.,Ward-4(1), Kolkata

Guest 06 March 2021 at 17:38

This appeal preferred by the assessee is against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-2, Kolkata dated 14.05.2019 for AY 2013-14.

Posted in Income Tax | 109 Views

Regent Motors Private Limited , Kolkata I.T.O.,Ward-7(2), Kolkata

Guest 06 March 2021 at 17:38

This appeal preferred by the assessee is against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-3, Kolkata dated 24.06.2019 for AY 2012-13.

Posted in Income Tax | 132 Views

Resolution plan filed by the corporate debtors has been approved by the COC under the provision of section 31(1) of the IBC, 2016

Guest 06 March 2021 at 17:38

The appeal preferred by the revenue and the Cross Objection preferred by the assessee are against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-1, Kolkata dated 15.09.2014 for AY 2010-11.

Posted in Income Tax | 137 Views