Income Tax Judgements

In The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S. Wescare (India) Ltd [Tax Case Appeal No.434 of 2021 dated September 02, 2021], the Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai ("the Appellant") had filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,

In MJunction Services Ltd. and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors. [WPO/441/2021 dated August 25, 2021], MJunction Services Ltd. ("the Petitioner") filed a writ petition being aggrieved by the new provision of Section 194 - O of the Income Tax Act, 1961

In Directorate of Enforcement v. Raj Singh Gehlot [ECIR/14/HQ-STF/2019 dated September 10, 2021], Raj Singh Gehlot ("the Applicant") moved a bail application for grant of regular bail but the bail plea was dismissed by Hon'ble Patiala House Court.

In T.D. Venkata Rao. v. Union of India [Appeal (civil) 2824 of 1992 dated December 08, 1998], the appeal in this case was filed by T.D. Venkata Rao ("the Appellant") challenging the validity of Section 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the IT Act").

These batch of seven appeals filed by the Assessee are directed against the separate Orders Dated 12.05.2017 of the Ld. CIT(A)-30, New Delhi, relating to the A.Ys. 2006- 2007 to 2012-2013 respectively.

This appeal filed by the assessee pertaining to assessment year 2014-15 is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-35, New Delhi dated 25.08.2017.

This appeal preferred by the Revenue emanates from the order of the Ld. CIT(Appeal), Pune-13 dated 25.03.2021 for the assessment year 2014-15.

The assessee has filed the present appeal against the order dated 08.05.2019 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-24, Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as the “CIT(A)”) relevant to the A.Y.2016-17. 2.

This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-16, Kolkata dated 25.04.2019 for AY 2013-14 .

These are appeals by the assessee against the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Mumbai (‘ld.CIT(A) for short) for the concerned assessment years.