Income Tax Judgements

Whether expenditure (including interest paid on funds borrowed) in respect of investment in shares of operating companies for acquiring and retaining a controlling interest therein is hit by section 14A of the Income tax Act, 1961 inasmuch as the div

The present appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) has been preferred by Sood Brij & Associates, a partnership firm, consisting of two partners namely A.K. Sood and B.M. Gupta, who are practicing Chartered Accountants.

Two appeals had been filed by the revenue, while the third appeal had been filed by the assessee. The revenue had filed appeals for both the assessment years, i.e., 1997-98 and 1998-99, while the assessee had filed an appeal only qua assessment year

The High Court, vide its impugned Judgment and Order dated 25.07.2005, has declared that Section 87(m)(ii) (b) of Finance (No.2) Act, 1998 is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India insofar as it seeks to deny the benefit of the ‘Kar Viv

Circumstances of the case in confirming the order of the CIT(A) whereby the CIT(A) held that since the interest paid on borrowed funds is more than the interest received on FDR, therefore, 90% of the gross interest received from FDR should not be re

Whether the penalty under section 271(1)(C)of the Income Tax Act. can be raised after the disclosure made by the Assessee of his full income without the presence of proper evidence.

“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned ITAT erred in holding that Assessee was not in default under Section 201(1) and not liable for interest for lower deduction of TDS under Section 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 19

This appeal under Section 260-A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as „the said Act‟) has been preferred by the revenue being aggrieved by the judgment and / or order dated 22.02.2008 passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in r

This appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act is at the instance of an assessee and is directed against order dated March 30, 2001, passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, “E” Bench, Calcutta, in Income-tax Appeal bearing IT (SS) A No.69/

HC dismissed the appeal and allow the Respondent to collect the penalty