The facts giving rise to these appeals briefly are that the appellant carries on the business of export of brass artwares and other Indian handicrafts. On 09.10.1991, two Advance Licences were issued to the appellant for import of 240 MT’s of brass d
The facts may be stated in brief here. M/s. Parle Bisleri Pvt., the appellant, manufactures soft drink flavours which are assigned ‘code names’, namely G-44T, L-33A, T-11PC, T-11P, R-66M, K- 55T and L-22L. During the period from years 89-90 to 93-94,
The question which arises for consideration in these appeals is whether the provisions contained in Sections 24, 24A and 26 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 (for short, `the Act’) operate as a bar against the prosecution of a person who is char
Facts and circumstances giving rise to the present appeal are that in order to fill up 15 posts of Junior Clerks in District Sonepur, applications were invited by an advertisement dated 25.06.1995. The advertisement made it clear that number of vacan
This is a unique case which reveals that an influential person can have allotment of a residential plot in discretionary quota within 48 hours of submission of application and then assert in Court that she has a right to have a land on a throwaway pr
New Delhi: Two-wheeler makers will now have to sell a helmet along with their bikes and scooters after the Supreme Court dismissed a plea by the Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers against such a step. A Bench comprising Justice G S Singhvi
The assessee, engaged in the manufacture of cement, entered into an agreement with M/s Walchandnagar Industries Limited, Bombay, ("the supplier") on 1st September, 1967 for purchase of additional cement plant from them for a total consideration of Rs
This appeal, by special leave, filed by the State of Maharashtra and its functionaries, arises out of the judgment dated 26th April, 2007 delivered by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No.1721 of 2004. By the impugned judgment,
Judgment on Ambani gas dispute
The Supreme Court has ruled that a husband or wife is not entitled to divorce if it is proved that one deserted the other due to constant torture or harassment.