The Karnataka High Court has ruled that legal heirs can claim compensation under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, even when a death is caused by a fallen tree branch, not directly by a vehicle's fault. The court clarified that under Section 163A, proof of negligence isn't required. However, it found that the deceased, who had borrowed the vehicle, stepped into the owner's shoes. Therefore, the claim was allowed based on the 'personal accident cover to insured-cum-driver' for which additional premium was paid, limiting the compensation to £1,00,000.
Court :
Karnataka High Court
Brief :
This appeal is filed challenging the judgement and award passed in MVC No.3020/2007 dated 05.02.2011 on the file of II Additional District and Sessions Judge and Additional MACT, Belagavi, questioning the liability and quantum of compensation.
Citation :
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. VS SMT.SUSILA W/O. SHAMRAO PATIL
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements
Subscribe to
CCI PRO
for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to
CCI PRO?
-
No Ads
-
WhatsApp Community
-
Daily E-Newsletter
-
Unlimited Judgements Access
-
Profile Visitors
-
Link Social Profiles
-
Featured Job Posts
-
Pro Badge
-
Expert GST Guidance
-
Unlimited Forum Replies
-
Download Content in PDF
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)
3 MONTHS PLAN
999
(Excl of GST ₹179)
View all CCI PRO benfits
Already a PRO member?
Login here
for an ad-free experience.