This Income Tax Appellate Tribunal case involves an appeal by Mr. Somashekhar Iranna Vadavadagi against an order from the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The assessee argued that the CIT(A) upheld an assessment order under Section 144 without providing adequate opportunity for representation and evidence. Key issues include the confirmation of additions totalling Rs. 57,49,010, specifically Rs. 53,97,810 related to cash deposits treated as unexplained money under Section 69A, which the assessee contested.
Court :
ITAT Bangalore
Brief :
This appeal is by the assessee directed against the order of CIT(A) dated 12.03.2019.
Citation :
ITA No.1380/Bang/2019
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements
Subscribe to
CCI PRO
for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to
CCI PRO?
-
No Ads
-
WhatsApp Community
-
Daily E-Newsletter
-
Unlimited Judgements Access
-
Profile Visitors
-
Link Social Profiles
-
Featured Job Posts
-
Pro Badge
-
Expert GST Guidance
-
Unlimited Forum Replies
-
Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN
1999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)
BEST VALUE
2 Years PLAN
3499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)
3 Months PLAN
999
(Excl. of GST ₹179)
View all CCI PRO benefits
Already a PRO member?
Login here
for an ad-free experience.