Mega Offer Avail 65% Off in CA IPCC and 50% Off in all CA CS CMA subjects.Coupon- IPCEXAM65 & EXAM50. Call: 088803-20003

CA Final Online Classes
CA Classes

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Adjudication Order in respect of Gopal Vittal, Bharti Telecom Ltd., Rohit Krishan Puri and Sunil Bharti Mittal in the matter of Trading by certain entities in the scrip of Bharti Airtel Limited

LinkedIn


Court :
SEBI

Brief :
Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as, “SEBI”) conducted investigation in respect of trading of certain entities in the scrip of Bharti Airtel Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‘BAL’/’Company’).

Citation :
[ADJUDICATION ORDER NO. Order/PM/VC/2020-21/9416-9419]

BEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA
[ADJUDICATION ORDER NO. Order/PM/VC/2020-21/9416-9419]

UNDER SECTION 15-I OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992 AND RULE 5 OF SEBI (PROCEDURE FOR HOLDING INQUIRY AND IMPOSING PENALTIES) RULES, 1995.

In respect of

Gopal Vittal
(PAN– AAAPV5759P)
Bharti Telecom Limited
(PAN- AAACB1456G)
Rohit Kishan Puri
(PAN- AOLPP8519G)
Sunil Bharti Mittal
(PAN- ABBPM8878J)

In the matter of

Trading by certain entities in the scrip of Bharti Airtel Limited

BACKGROUND
1. Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as, “SEBI”) conducted investigation in respect of trading of certain entities in the scrip of Bharti Airtel Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‘BAL’/’Company’). On the basis of the said investigation, SEBI initiated adjudication proceedings under Section 15G of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as “SEBI Act”) against Mr. Gopal Vittal (hereinafter referred to as “Noticee 1”) and Bharti Telecom Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “BTL”/“Noticee 2”) for the alleged violations of Section 12A(d) & (e) of the SEBI Act read with Regulation 4(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as “PIT Regulations”) and against Rohit Krishan Puri (hereinafter referred to as “Noticee 3") and Sunil Bharti Mittal (hereinafter referred to as “Noticee 4”) under section 15HB of the SEBI Act for the alleged violation of clause 8 of Schedule B under Regulation 9(1) of PIT Regulations, in respect of the dealings of Noticees 1 & 2 in the scrip of BAL. Noticees 1, 2, 3 and 4 are hereinafter collectively referred to as “Noticees”.

To know more in details find the attachment file

 

Guest
on 28 October 2020
Published in LAW
Views : 20
downloaded 8 times
Report Abuse

LinkedIn







Trending Tags
X

Do you have any Tax Queries

Submit