Liability of 0.1% concessional rate of tax under GST

Last updated: 27 November 2021
Quick Summary
This ruling by the Karnataka Authority for Advance Rulings clarifies the applicability of the 0.1% concessional rate of tax under GST. The decision addresses specific scenarios and provides guidance on when this reduced tax rate can be legitimately applied. It aims to bring certainty to taxpayers regarding this particular tax provision.

Court :
The Principal Commissioner of Central Taxes, Belgaum Commissionerate

Brief :
Whether they are liable for 0.1% concessional rate of tax under Notification No.41/2017-IT (Rate) on supply of HDPE Drums for use by the manufacturer of Ethyl Alcohol in his factory for packing his manufactured goods and supply to merchant exporter?

Citation :
KAR ADRG 54/2021

THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS IN KARNATAKA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX VANIJYA THERIGE KARYALAYA, KALIDASA ROAD GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 009 
Advance Ruling No. KAR ADRG 54/2021 Dated : 29-10-2021 
Present: 
1. Dr.M.P. Ravi Prasad Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes . . . Member (State) 
2. Sri. T. Kiran Reddy Joint Commissioner of Customs & Indirect Taxes . . . .Member (Central) 

Please find attached the enclosed file for the full judgement.

FAQ :

The ruling concerns the liability and applicability of the 0.1% concessional rate of tax under the Goods and Services Tax (GST).

The ruling was issued by the Authority for Advance Rulings in Karnataka, Goods and Services Tax.

The ruling is dated 29-10-2021.

The members were Dr. M.P. Ravi Prasad (Member - State) and Sri. T. Kiran Reddy (Member - Central).

 

Poojitha Raam Vinay
Published in GST
Views : 347
downloaded 305 times
Share Report Abuse
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. Forest Development Tax Demand, Collection and Refund Subject to Final Outcome of Pending Cases
  2. Forest Development Tax Demand, Collection and Refund Subject to Final Outcome of Pending Cases
  3. SC : Extended Limitation Cannot Be Invoked Where Department Was Aware of Valuation Facts
  4. SC : Selling Shares While in Possession of UPSI Constitutes Insider Trading Even if No Profit Is Made
  5. SC : Laser Imagers Compatible with Machines Under Different Tariff Headings Classifiable Under CTH 9033
  6. Education Consultancy Services to Foreign Universities Not Intermediary Services; Refund of IGST on Export of Services Allowed
  7. Penalty Cannot Be Confirmed Beyond What is Specified in Statutory Form GST DRC-01
  8. Non-Supply of Field Visit Report Vitiates Rejection of Revocation Application
  9. Alternative Remedy before GSTAT to be Exhausted Despite Allegation that Adjudication Travelled Beyond SCN
  10. ITAT Jodhpur: AO Allows ₹2.61 Crore Deduction under Sections 54EC and 54F; Assessee's Appeal Dismissed as Infructuous

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member yogesh koraniyogesh koraniPro Member GOVIND VAJIRAJ DESAIGOVIND VAJIRAJ DESAIPro Member Rasheed Mohd AbdulRasheed Mohd AbdulPro Member Sagar KhakhiwalaSagar KhakhiwalaPro Member Fahima MalikFahima Malik
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category