Executive (F&A)
2387 Points
Joined July 2008
Originally posted by : CA. Dashrath Maheshwari |
 |
However ICAI has regulation :
39(2) The Council may, in its discretion, revise the marks obtained by all candidates or a section of candidates in any particular paper or papers or in the aggregate in such manner as may be considered necessary, for maintaining the standards of pass percentage provided in these Regulations.
But I dont think they have ever used this right!!! |
 |
Sir..,
After exam I expected to score
55-59 in Accounts got 58,
60-70 in SFM got 56,
45-50 in Audit got 46( Considering Audit valuation is always strict )
45-50 in Law got 56
45-50 in cost got 41
43-48 in isca got 34
43-45 in DT got 36
58 in IDT got 58.
I attempted above 85 marks in all subs. In DT I can say that they dint give any marks for half correct answers or stages, they alloted marks only those answers which are 100% correct. So I think valuation criteria is different for different Subjects.We can get good marks in IDT or Law but not in DT or Audit. One more thing for attention of old course students who now converted to new, till now MICS in considered scoring subject in second group and valuation was littel bit liberal, But not in ISCA. We can say ICAI giving equal importance to this subject considering raising requirement of ISA qualification for Members. So dont neglect it.