Whether repair/renovation of a flat is taxable

995 views 3 replies

"Repair, alteration, renovation.. service in relation to residential complex" is taxable as 'construction of complex
 service'
 

In a housing society comprising of about 150 flats, one flat is to be renovated. The entire complex is certainly a
'residential complex' but renovation is of a single flat - not of the complex itself.

Will such renovation of a single flat amount to renovation 'in relation to residential complex'? Will it be taxable?

Does the situation change if transaction is classified under 'works contract' service?

Replies (3)

There are two aspects to the question:

(i) Whether it is non-taxable for the reason that it is not repair of the complex but of a single flat?

(ii) Whether it is non-taxable for the reason that the flat is for personal use of the service receipient.

It appears to me that the transaction would be non-taxable on the second ground given above.

'Construction of complex' means construction of new residential complex or a part therof. Repair/ renovation is covered by the definition as repair, alteration, renovation.. in relation to residential complex. It appears to me that 'part of residential complex' is also a residential complex.

 

As regards 'personal use' we may note that:

a. Construction by a person directly engaging any other person ... intended for personal use is not taxable.

b. Repair is covered within the words 'construction of complex'.

c. Therefore, repair/ renovation of a flat would not be taxable.

 

I would request other members to give their inputs on the issue.

Do other members hold the same view? In that case, pls see the following:

1. It was viewed that when a builder/ developer enters into agreement with a prospective buyer for construction and sale of a flat, the builder/ developer was providing a service. The current budget says that if the payment is made in advance, it would be deemed that the builder/ developer is providing service.

2. It would tantamount to directly engage the builder/ developer by such individual buyer for construction. Therefore, the activity should be covered by the exclusion clause and no service tax should be payable.

 

Kindly comment.

The fact that the flat was for personal use means that the original - complex was excluded in the defintion itslef.

 

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
24 June 2026
Chartered Accountant

CA Darshita Shah & Co

Nadiad

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 28 June 2026
Article Assistant

Sharma Chetan And Company

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
20 June 2026
Chartered Accountant

ANV & Company

New Delhi

CA

View Details
Company
24 June 2026
Senior Account (VA Client Operations)

Karbon Business

Bengaluru

CA Inter

View Details
Company
25 June 2026
AUDIT MANAGER

JDAS & ASSOCIATES

New Delhi

CA

View Details
Company
06 July 2026
Accountant

Agarwal Anoop and Associates

Noida

CA Final

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 24 June 2026
CA Article Trainee

Rahul Dang & Associates

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
10 June 2026
Senior Account Executive

JDS Advisory LLP

Ahmedabad

CA Inter

View Details