Vat entry in accounts

While reviewing financial statements of a listed company, I found "VAT paid a/c" in debit side of P/L and "VAT realised A/c" in credit side of P/L and both are having same figures. On further investigation I discovered that the company is treating VAT Input ( in case of purchases) as its expense and naming it as "VAT paid A/c" while VAT output ( in case of sale) is treated as income and naming it as " VAT realised A/c". thats why both the accounts are shown in the P/L a/c. Now the excess of "VAT realised" over "VAT paid" is paid to the govt. and the entry is passed through "VAT paid A/c". this makes both the balance of "VAT paid" and "VAT realised" equal and thus the effect in P/L is nullified.

I want to know that whether the accouting treatment followed by the company is correct and if not, please sujjest the correct accounting treatment.

Replies (5)

No Accounting Treatment is not correct

1) When purchase

 

Purchase A/c ..........Dr

Vat receivable A/c .......Dr

             To Party A/c

  

 

2) When Sale

 

Party A/c .............Dr

         To Sale A/c

          To Vat Payable

 

 

3) At the time of Vat payment

 

     Vat Payable A/c ........Dr

                To Vat Recivable

                 To Bank (In case of excess Vat Payable)

 

 

 

The accounting treatment followed by the entity is not proper for recording the transactions relating to VAT.  Please refer to the Guidance Note given below.  Refer pages 249 onwards for the treatment of VAT Paid & Collected:

https://220.227.161.86/23635research13.pdf

The treatment followed by the firm is not correct and i also satisfy with second one .

When I questioned the company about their accounting treatment, they replied that they are doing this accoording to provisions of section 145A of Income Tax act which says that "the valuation of purchase and sale of goods and inventory for the purposes of determining the income chargeable under the head “Profits and gains of business or profession” shall include the amount of any tax, duty, cess or fee (by whatever name called) actually paid or incurred by the assessee to bring the goods to the place of its location and condition as on the date of valuation."

The section also says that "any tax, duty, cess or fee (by whatever name called) under any law for the time being in force, shall include all such payment notwithstanding any right arising as a consequence to such payment."

Please explain the relationship between section 145A and the accouting treatment and also the significance of section 145A. 

 

 

 Yes , This is write ans.. bcz we are generally using this entry in our firm.......

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
ARTICLESHIP 26 August 2026
CA Article Assistant/CA Drop Out/Accounts Executive

PARV & Co.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
11 August 2026
COMPLIANCE EXECUTIVE

YMW COMPLIANCE SERVICES LLP

Others

CA Final

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 25 August 2026
CA Article's

Saini Pati Shah & Co LLP

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 17 August 2026
Article Assistant

Jain Ankit and Co

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
11 August 2026
Manager / Senior Manager - Statutory Audit

CommerceCareer

New Delhi

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 24 August 2026
Article Assistant

M/s.S.G.Salecha & Co.

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 14 August 2026
Article Assistant

N J Suresh & Associates

Bengaluru

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 17 August 2026
Article Assistant

K R Kiran Kumar & Associates

Bengaluru

CA Inter

View Details