Unduly Long Articleship

Articleship 1088 views 7 replies

I am a Chartered Accountant myself. Though not practicing but I have done my articleship. And i strongly feel our institute is not justified in making students undergo articleship of 3 to 3.5 years.

NO other professional course, not even medical students are made to undertake apprenticeship / articleship for such a long period.  In medicine the apprentice period is for 6 months. Engineering students also require only 6 months of project work. MBA students have a summer project and a few other projects.

The trouble is not with working for such long. However, everyone must understand that no one trains you for 3 years. Within six months you have to take responsibility for the work that you do. And almost everyone is expected to work diligently and professionally and I am sure most of us do. However no one considers the same as a serious job. And while even after working for 5 years in a professional manner I am considered to be working for only 2 years because articleship is not counted as work experience.

Also I have seen and read about people complaining how various CAs are not concerned about the student's learning but interested in getting their work done. This way we are not creating quality for future CAs. Much better assignments / projects should be part of the curriculum and practical training should come not as ticking with green and red pens but providing much better understanding about business, finance and accounting. Else we would be creating a generation of CAs who would constantly keep getting caught up between petty issues and cause degrowth to their own careers.

I sincerely feel its a very serious issue and there should be some quality brought to our articleship structure.

Replies (7)

Fully agreeing with you..ICAI itself should take appropriate and timely action.

Originally posted by : Abhishek Shah

I am a Chartered Accountant myself. Though not practicing but I have done my articleship. And i strongly feel our institute is not justified in making students undergo articleship of 3 to 3.5 years.

NO other professional course, not even medical students are made to undertake apprenticeship / articleship for such a long period.  In medicine the apprentice period is for 6 months. Engineering students also require only 6 months of project work. MBA students have a summer project and a few other projects.

The trouble is not with working for such long. However, everyone must understand that no one trains you for 3 years. Within six months you have to take responsibility for the work that you do. And almost everyone is expected to work diligently and professionally and I am sure most of us do. However no one considers the same as a serious job. And while even after working for 5 years in a professional manner I am considered to be working for only 2 years because articleship is not counted as work experience.

Also I have seen and read about people complaining how various CAs are not concerned about the student's learning but interested in getting their work done. This way we are not creating quality for future CAs. Much better assignments / projects should be part of the curriculum and practical training should come not as ticking with green and red pens but providing much better understanding about business, finance and accounting. Else we would be creating a generation of CAs who would constantly keep getting caught up between petty issues and cause degrowth to their own careers.

I sincerely feel its a very serious issue and there should be some quality brought to our articleship structure.

I'm really pleased that being a CA you thinks like that,

Thanks of lot for sharing. 

i too agree with the point..

3.5yrs is a very long tenure and students are not allowed to pursue more than one additional course during the articleship period which is a big drawback.

I agree too.
 

i wish that icai members and director are also think like you.

and amend the articleship time.

i agree with j.k gupta

my ca hardly maintains any attendance register...

and wth out tht no evidences can be taken against him...bt the thng is this ca being a highly qualified course does not have any provision favouring the article...

one thing m worried about is all this will certainly affect my future (job prospectives) because while appearing in an job interview i cant say tht my firm didnt had much work thts why i lack practical knowledge becoz all these will appear to  be mere excuses....

institute should seriously pay attention towards ths prospects becoz ths made me thnk tht taking dummy is much better thn wht m doing like all my other friends

thnk u all for shwng concern

mandeep kaur 

 

We are now facing the problems due to a few unscrupulous auditors. Therefore to protect Student's Interest the Institute should withdraw the notification of NON-TRANSFERABILITY OF ARTICLESHIP Provision.

 Some of them are behaving us like Bonded Laborers and even if we are not getting enough exposure we are required to continue with the same. This is against the Constitutional Freedom Provided to the Citizens in our country. More students are taking DUMMY ARTICLESHIP due to this hardship.

We all should request our Institute to stand on our behalf and save the student’s Interest. As I personally think that we the students of ICAI are the backbone and future of ICAI and the Profession.

If the whole world is adopting Free Market Mechanism then why our institute can’t. We all have seen the failure of our beloved mother India up to 1991 due to the License Raj and Protectionism . The same should not happen again in our Profession.


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register