Supreme court verdict on aadhaar linking

As per Today's Supreme Court Verdict:

Aadhaar not mandatory for Banks, mobile phone connections and school admissions.

For those who missed my article they can follow the link:

https://www.caclubindia.com/articles/-aadhaar-linking-what-will-happen-if-supreme-court-rules-in-favour-of-the-govt--31788.asphttps://www.caclubindia.com/articles/-aadhaar-linking-what-will-happen-if-supreme-court-rules-in-favour-of-the-govt--31788.asp

Blog: https://craig-dsilva-on-demonetization.law.blog/

Replies (1)

Here are the main points followed by live updates of all the developments:

  • Justice Sikhri has conditionally upheld the constitutional validity of Aadhaar.
  • SC has made compulsory the linking of Aadhaar with PAN.
  • Private companies cannot insist on Aadhaar.
  • National security exception for disclosure of Aaadhaar information as per Seciton 33(2) has been struck down.
  • ‘Being unique is better than being best and Aadhaar is unique,’ Justie Sikhri has observed.
  • CBSE, NEET cannot mandate Aadhaar.
  • Aadhaar not mandatory for school admissions.
  • The Supreme Court has directed the government to not give Aadhaar to illegal immigrants.
  • The Supreme Court has observed that as of today it does not find anything in the Aadhaar Act that ‘violates right to privacy of individual citizen.’
  • Bank accounts need not be mandatorily linked to Aadhaar: SC
  • No person should be denied rights due to the lack of Aadhaar, SC has observed.
  • Aadhaar-Mobile linking not mandatory: No mobile company can demand mandatory linking of Aadhaar card to their connections.
  • Justice Chandrachud observed that Aadhaar has ‘serious problems’ about exclusion, and the right of the marginalised to benefits cannot be made to depend on it.
  • Justice Chandrachud also said that Aadhaar has ‘reduced’ a person to just 12 digits and demanded the government first bring out a proper data protection regime.
  • Constitutional guarantees cannot be left to risks posed by technological advancements, Justice Chandrachud added.
  • Justice Ashok Bhushan says he ‘broadly agrees’ with the judgement of Justice Sikri, which is the majority judgement.
  • Justice Bhushan also feels that ‘rightful beneficiaries’ should not be denied services, subsidies and benefits. He says he is sure steps will be taken to minimise the mismatch.

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Follow