Supreme court verdict on aadhaar linking

278 views 1 replies

As per Today's Supreme Court Verdict:

Aadhaar not mandatory for Banks, mobile phone connections and school admissions.

For those who missed my article they can follow the link:

https://www.caclubindia.com/articles/-aadhaar-linking-what-will-happen-if-supreme-court-rules-in-favour-of-the-govt--31788.asphttps://www.caclubindia.com/articles/-aadhaar-linking-what-will-happen-if-supreme-court-rules-in-favour-of-the-govt--31788.asp

Blog: https://craig-dsilva-on-demonetization.law.blog/

Replies (1)

Here are the main points followed by live updates of all the developments:

  • Justice Sikhri has conditionally upheld the constitutional validity of Aadhaar.
  • SC has made compulsory the linking of Aadhaar with PAN.
  • Private companies cannot insist on Aadhaar.
  • National security exception for disclosure of Aaadhaar information as per Seciton 33(2) has been struck down.
  • ‘Being unique is better than being best and Aadhaar is unique,’ Justie Sikhri has observed.
  • CBSE, NEET cannot mandate Aadhaar.
  • Aadhaar not mandatory for school admissions.
  • The Supreme Court has directed the government to not give Aadhaar to illegal immigrants.
  • The Supreme Court has observed that as of today it does not find anything in the Aadhaar Act that ‘violates right to privacy of individual citizen.’
  • Bank accounts need not be mandatorily linked to Aadhaar: SC
  • No person should be denied rights due to the lack of Aadhaar, SC has observed.
  • Aadhaar-Mobile linking not mandatory: No mobile company can demand mandatory linking of Aadhaar card to their connections.
  • Justice Chandrachud observed that Aadhaar has ‘serious problems’ about exclusion, and the right of the marginalised to benefits cannot be made to depend on it.
  • Justice Chandrachud also said that Aadhaar has ‘reduced’ a person to just 12 digits and demanded the government first bring out a proper data protection regime.
  • Constitutional guarantees cannot be left to risks posed by technological advancements, Justice Chandrachud added.
  • Justice Ashok Bhushan says he ‘broadly agrees’ with the judgement of Justice Sikri, which is the majority judgement.
  • Justice Bhushan also feels that ‘rightful beneficiaries’ should not be denied services, subsidies and benefits. He says he is sure steps will be taken to minimise the mismatch.

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
ARTICLESHIP 27 June 2026
CA Articled Trainee And Paid Assistant

SKAA & Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
24 June 2026
Chartered Accountant

CA Darshita Shah & Co

Nadiad

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 27 June 2026
Article

SNCO

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
09 June 2026
Accounts Associate

S Madan and CO

New Delhi

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
10 June 2026
Senior Account Executive

JDS Advisory LLP

Ahmedabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
12 June 2026
Accounts & Taxation Executive

Winshine Financial Services

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 24 June 2026
ARTICLE ASSISTANT

BHUPINDER SHAH AND COMPANY

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 18 June 2026
Article Assistance

RB KESHRI & CO.

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details