CA in Practice
35867 Points
Joined June 2009
Dear Devanshi Gandhi
Please quote some section or any case law in support of your claim.
In the case law there is mention that the same is applicable before introduction of rule 32B prescribing the minimum stipend rules was prescribed by the Institute which do not follow the follow the practice of paying a meager amount to meet the cost of books, fees, etc and hence cannot be termed as receipt for the purpose of meeting the cost of education to be exempt u/s 10(16).
Even Madhusudhan who was supporting the case law is agreeing with me.