Service tax cut-off date unclear

Others 1572 views 7 replies

With the service tax rate being reversed from 12 to 10 per cent, a question which the service providers face is to determine the day on which the new service tax rate is effective. Even after 15 years of introduction of service tax in India, this very crucial legal issue is still unresolved. Controversies are going on, some tribunal judgments have come out but there is no trade notice, no circular and no clear law. In contrast, he customs law has Section 15 and Excise law has Rule 5 which give clearly the date which will be relevant for charging the rate of duty. Under the Section 15 of Customs Act it is the date of filing the bill of entry or the date of clearance from the warehouse or the date of payment of duty depending on different situations. In Rule 5 of Excise Law it is the date of clearance of goods from the factory. In service tax law there is no specific provision . So the prevailing practices in different places are different. The alternatives in the case of service tax are two. First it can be the date of rendering the service. This looks like a natural choice as the taxable event in the case of service tax is the date of rendering service. But legally there is no relation between taxable event and the date of determination of duty. In the Customs Act and the Excise Act the dates for determining the rate of duty have nothing to do with the taxable event. So in Service tax also it can be any date convenient. There is on the other hand a natural difficulty in choosing this date of rendering service as the dates can be multiple and ever changing and sometime continuous. For example in the case of telephone and internet, it is continuous and in the case of services rendered through software, it is indeterminate and difficult to find out. Moreover at the time of rendering the service there is no knowing what the value will be. Payment is usually much after the date of rendering the service. Second alternative is the date of payment of service tax by the service provider to the government. This date is determinate and has the advantage of being easily verifiable from the invoice and other documents. It also has the advantage of being based on the invoice which indicates the value. It is no wonder that one judgment[1] in the Tribunal has accepted the date of payment as the date for determination, though the logic is wrong in the case of this judgment. Another judgment[2] has referred to it also but has not given a final view. To remove doubt and avoidable litigation it is essential that the Board issues a circular or trade notice immediately indicating what should be the date for determination of duty for the purpose of service tax. But really speaking on a fundamentally legal issue like this, a circular cannot be the valid solution. The Act or the Rule must incorporate the provision. Law cannot be laid down by a circular. It can only clarify a legal position. Temporarily the circular will serve the purpose of removing the doubt and bringing in parity in practice. But in the next Budget the legal provision must be brought about in the same line as the Customs Act and Central Excise Act and Rules. And it should be the date of payment of duty to the government.

Replies (7)

Very good and eye opener article.

GOOD POINT RAISED, BUT GENERAL PRACTICE IS IN SERVICE TAX IS THAT DATE OF SERVICE( S) PROVIDED IS CRUCIAL, IT IS VERY IMPORTANT FOR DECIDING THE DATE OF PROVISION OF SERVICES IN CERTAIN CASES IT IS VERY DIFFICULT TO PROVE THE DATE OF PROVISION OF SERVICE SUCH AS SOFT WARE DEVELOPMENT ETC. BUT THUMB RULE IS PROVISION OF SERVICES IS EVENT OF TAXABILITY OF SEVICE BUT LIABILITY BECOMES DUE ON RECEIPT OFTHE PAYMENT OF THE SERVICES. SO WHEN GOVT HAS ANNOUNCE REDUCTION OF SERVICE TAX FROM 24-2-2009 i e UP TO 24TH FEB 09 SERVICE PROVIDED WILL BE CHARGED @ 12.36% AND THERE AFTER 10.30%( INCLUDING E CESS & SHE CESS.) OBVISIOUSLY LOT MANY CONFUSIONS MAY ARISE. BUT SERVICE PROVIDED AFTER 24-2-2009 HAVE TO BE CHARGED WITH NEW RATE IT MEANS WE HAVE TO PRE PARE TWO SEPARATE BILLS FOR THE MONTH OF FEB 1ST TO 23RD FEB @ 12.36% AND 24 TO 28TH FEB @ 10.36% IF SERVICES PROVIDED ON MONTHLY BASIS, HERE ONE DIFFICULTY MAY ARISES IN CASE OF RUNNING BILLS UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND LIKE ACTIVITIES, THERE FOR WORK CERTIFIED UP TO 24 FEB WILL BE CHARGED @ 12.36% AND WORK CERTIFIED FOR THE PERIOD AFTER 24TH WILL BE CHARGED AT 10.30% HOPE THIS DISCUSSION MAY ARISE NEW QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS .
Originally posted by :CA.Tarun Maheshwari
" Very good and eye opener article. "

In my view date of raising invoice is the correct date for assessment of Tax.

imposition of tax and collection of tax are different things. Altough providing service is basis of tax, service tax is collected when such services are monetised in terms of invoice. Hence the date of monetisation is relevant.

For example, Central Excise duty is on manufacture, but taxes are levied when goods leave the factory gate, and hence date of leaving factory date is relevant. Income is generated all the year around, but taxes are assessed on 1st April of next year, and hence that date is relevant.

I am totally convinced with Rajesh, for my understanding tax assessment should be based on Invoice date.

I also agree with Mr. Rajesh since generally services are rendered whole of the month but the invoice is raised once in the month whihc is month end so the date of raising invoice is relevent not the date of service rendering. Had this been the question of applicability of service tax on some service the date would have been the date of amendment.

I also agree with Rajesh. But some parties  who have not raised the bills upto 23.2.09 or have not received the payments till 23.2.09 , cancels the bills, raises the new bills of later date to save the service tax .  The department generaly objects in these matters. Therefore, to avoid various complications and to be clear, service tax payers should raise the bills for services provided upto 23.2.2009 and the new bill is required to be raised for 24.2.2009 onwards at lower rate. If the rate is higher, then department never take the objection, but in this case the situation is exactly reverse.

However, technicaly Rajesh is correct. But practically the above procedure will be best one.

Any how, the cut off for this type at present is "date of provision of service" only!

 


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register