Section 9 (1)(vi) and section 194j

757 views 1 replies

The provisions of section 9(1)(vi) [explanation vi] has been amended vide Finance Act, 20123 with retrospective effect from 1-6-1976. Now, it includes internet services within its ambit.

My question is just because the aforesaid section has been amended retrospectively, the parralel section, i.e. section 194J for TDS would also be amended retrospectively is correct ?

 

please refer any case laws also.

Replies (1)

      As per explanation to Section 194J the term "royalty" shall have the same meaning as in Explanation 2 to clause (vi) of sub-section (1) of section 9. That means retrospective amendment in section 9(1)(vi) would be applicable to "royalty" for the purposes of the section 194J also.

          There is no requirement of any case law as it is clear in plain reading.

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
ARTICLESHIP 27 June 2026
CA Articled Trainee And Paid Assistant

SKAA & Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 24 June 2026
ARTICLE ASSISTANT

BHUPINDER SHAH AND COMPANY

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
06 July 2026
Accountant

Agarwal Anoop and Associates

Noida

CA Final

View Details
Company
22 June 2026
Accountant

Global Image Technologies Private Limited

New Delhi

MBA

View Details
Company
29 June 2026
ACCOUNTANT

SANDEEP AASHISH & CO

Araria

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 24 June 2026
CA Article Trainee

Rahul Dang & Associates

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 24 June 2026
HEAD - AUDIT AND TAXATION

A R JADHAV AND ASSOCIATES

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 30 June 2026
2 posts Article assistant and Articleship completed students

Chirag N Shah & Associates

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details