The provisions of section 9(1)(vi) [explanation vi] has been amended vide Finance Act, 20123 with retrospective effect from 1-6-1976. Now, it includes internet services within its ambit.
My question is just because the aforesaid section has been amended retrospectively, the parralel section, i.e. section 194J for TDS would also be amended retrospectively is correct ?
please refer any case laws also.
As per explanation to Section 194J the term "royalty" shall have the same meaning as in Explanation 2 to clause (vi) of sub-section (1) of section 9. That means retrospective amendment in section 9(1)(vi) would be applicable to "royalty" for the purposes of the section 194J also.
There is no requirement of any case law as it is clear in plain reading.
Subrahmanyam & Sivudu CA Firm
Hyderabad
CA Inter
View Details
Twenty Point Nine Five Ventures Private Limited
Noida
CA Inter
View Details
Kothari Jain Patil & Chartered Accountants
Pune
CA Inter
View Details
Anupam Parashar & Co.
Ghaziabad
CA Final
View Details
Interactive Media Pvt Ltd.
New Delhi
CA Inter
View Details
CCI
Pro
CAclubindia
