Section 54f and Sale between father and Son.

 

 

Mr. Bruce Wayne recently sold an urban plot of land for ₹1 crore, resulting in a long-term capital gain of around ₹50 lakh. He owns only one residential house in his own name.

 

He is now planning to purchase a flat currently owned by his son, Mr. Iron Man, using the entire sale proceeds. The flat was originally purchased by the son more than a decade ago. The proposed sale value is ₹1.20 crore, while the current circle rate of the flat is about ₹1.10 crore.

 

Mr. Bruce Wayne intends to claim capital gains exemption under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act. The transaction will be done through proper banking channels at a fair price, and both father and son will declare the same in their respective returns.

 

The questions are:

 

1. Can a father validly purchase a residential flat from his son and still claim exemption under Section 54F, if the consideration is paid in full and at market rate?

 

 

2. Will such a transaction be treated as genuine by the Income Tax Department if proper documentation, bank trail, and valuation reports are maintained?

 

 

3. Is there any legal mechanism—such as an advance ruling or prior declaration—to obtain confirmation from the tax authorities in advance, so that no notice or dispute arises later?

 

Please suggest steps to be taken as it's a genuine transaction. 

 

Insights based on recent case laws or professional experience would be very helpful.

 

Replies (6)
Quick Summary
This discussion examines whether a father can purchase a residential flat from his son and still claim capital gains exemption under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act. The key questions revolve around the genuineness of such intra-family transactions, particularly when the sale price exceeds the circle rate but the son's indexed cost is higher than the sale value. It seeks guidance on necessary documentation, potential tax issues under Sections 50C or 56(2)(x), and ways to obtain advance confirmation from tax authorities to avoid future disputes.

Stamp Duty as well as registration fee will be around 5-7 lakhs and will be paid by the father i.e purchaser. Please guide. 

Capital Gains & Section 54F – Purchase of Son’s Flat by Father

Facts (for context):

Particulars & Details

Seller of Land ----------------------------Mr. Bruce Wayne (Father)

Sale of Urban Land ---------------------- ₹1.00 crore

Long-Term Capital Gain ---------------- Approx ₹70 lakh

Buyer of Flat   -----------------------------Mr. Bruce Wayne (Father)

Seller of Flat-------------------------------Mr. Iron Man (Son)

Original Purchase Year ------------------(Son) More than 11 years ago

Son’s Indexed Cost-----------------------Approx₹1.50 crore

Proposed Sale Value (Father to pay)--- ₹1.20 crore

Circle Rate / Ready Reckoner Value----₹1.10 crore

Stamp Duty & Registration---------------₹5–7 lakh (to be paid by Father)

Mode of Payment--------------------------Through Banking Channels Cheque & RTGS

Purpose--------------------------------------Father intends to claim exemption under Section 54F & Son needs Money for buying another property.

 

Main Questions:

  1. Can a father validly purchase a residential flat from his son and still claim exemption under Section 54F, if the consideration is fully paid and at a fair market rate?
  2. Will such a transaction be treated as genuine by the Income Tax Department if proper documentation, bank trail, and valuation reports are maintained?
  3. Is there any legal mechanism (such as an advance ruling or prior declaration) to obtain pre-confirmation from the tax authorities, so that no notice or dispute arises later?
  4. Since the son’s indexed cost (₹1.50 crore) is higher than the sale value (₹1.20 crore), will this create any tax issue for either party — particularly under Section 50C or 56(2)(x) — even though the sale price exceeds the circle rate (₹1.10 crore)?
  5. What precautions or documentation steps should both parties take to ensure that the transaction is accepted as bona fide and the Section 54F exemption is not denied during scrutiny?

Any professional insights, case references, or recent tribunal rulings on similar intra-family transactions will be highly appreciated. Thank you.


Definitely ao will not accept in view of test of human probability andsurroundings circumstances,  law of preponderance of probability, it nothing else than colorable device to evade tax. 

U might get some relief at the level of ITAT

 

Entire sake consideration is not taxable.

What about Kavita Manoj Damani case Mumbai Powai. Wasn't that a similar one.?? 

Any case laws available.??

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
ARTICLESHIP 08 October 2026
ARTICLE TRAINEE

S.B.G. & CO. CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
05 October 2026
Senior Accountant

Vision IT Peripherals Pvt Ltd

Mumbai

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 20 October 2026
CA ARTICLE

AMKN & CO

Noida

CA Inter

View Details
Company
08 October 2026
Accounts and Tax Associate

POOJA R TELI & CO

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
16 October 2026
CA article trainee

Zerdi & Co. Chartered Accountants

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 01 October 2026
Articled Assistant

KPSN & Associates LLP

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
30 September 2026
Senior Accounts Executive

Codeboard Technology

Chennai

MBA

View Details
Company
19 October 2026
Accountant

Jari Saree Center

New Delhi

Others

View Details