Hi,
This is a very common issue faced during transit, and the good news is — yes, you have strong grounds to challenge this penalty. Let me explain:
๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ ๐ญ: ๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ% ๐ฃ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฎ๐น๐๐ ๐ต๐๐๐๐ถ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ฑ?
The penalty has been imposed under Section 129 of the CGST Act, which deals with detention, seizure, and release of goods in transit. Under this section:
→ If the owner comes forward: Penalty = 200% of tax payable (which is what has been imposed on you — โน10,46,000)
→ If the owner does not come forward: Penalty = 50% of the value of goods
However, there is an important distinction. Section 129 is meant for cases where there is an intent to evade tax. In your case:
• Goods were accompanied by a valid Delivery Challan
• Exhibition Letter was present (proving no sale, only display)
• E-Way Bill was generated — it had merely expired
• There was no intention to evade GST
The Supreme Court and multiple High Courts have consistently held that mere technical or procedural violations (like E-Way Bill expiry) without intent to evade tax cannot attract heavy penalties under Section 129.
๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฎ: ๐๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฆ๐๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐
1. Satyam Shivam Papers Pvt Ltd vs State of UP (Allahabad HC) — Held that E-Way Bill expiry alone, when all other documents are valid, does not justify Section 129 penalty. Penalty was quashed.
2. Synergy Fertichem Pvt Ltd vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat HC) — Ruled that when goods are genuine and properly documented, expiry of E-Way Bill is a technical breach, not tax evasion.
3. Assistant Commissioner vs Hindustan Herbal Cosmetics (Kerala HC) — Penalty under Section 129 set aside where there was no intent to evade tax.
These judgments clearly establish that procedural lapses ≠ tax evasion.
๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฏ: ๐ฆ๐๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ ๐๐ผ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ฒ๐ป๐ด๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฃ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฎ๐น๐๐
1. File an Appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act before the Appellate Authority within 3 months from the date of the order (extendable by 1 month)
2. Pre-deposit: You'll need to pay 10% of the disputed tax amount (not penalty) as pre-deposit to file the appeal
3. Grounds for Appeal:
→ E-Way Bill was generated but expired — this is a procedural lapse, not evasion
→ All other documents (Challan, Exhibition Letter) were in order
→ Goods were for exhibition, not sale — no taxable supply involved
→ Cite the above HC judgments as precedent
→ Section 129 penalty is disproportionate for a technical breach
4. Alternatively, you may also file a Writ Petition before the High Court if the penalty order is grossly arbitrary
๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ ๐ : ๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ก๐ฒ๐
๐ ๐ง๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ
→ Always extend the E-Way Bill before expiry (can be done via Part-B update on the portal)
→ Set calendar reminders for E-Way Bill validity
→ Keep a copy of the exhibition invitation/registration as additional proof
Pro tip: Tools like Clyntr.ai have a built-in Compliance Calendar that auto-tracks GST deadlines including E-Way Bill expiry, GSTR filing dates, and TDS due dates. It also handles Tally posting and GSTR-2B reconciliation automatically — helpful when you're managing multiple dispatches and don't want compliance gaps. Free plan available at clyntr.com
I'd strongly recommend filing the appeal. Based on precedent, you have a very good chance of getting the penalty reduced or quashed entirely.
All the best!