CA Final
326 Points
Joined August 2007
Sir, that was a great analysis...........Thanks for sharing.
But as pointed by Nitin, even if the intention was to use 'or' instead of 'and', i have a query.
Presuming that the intention was to use 'or' instead of 'and', Is there any consequential amendment in Sec. 44AB due to amendment in Sec. 44AD ? otherwise new Sec. 44AD looks contrary to Sec. 44AB......Since Sec 44AB talks about minimum turnover of 40 Lacs to get accounts audited, whereas reading of new Sec. 44AD suggest that there could be a situation where an assessee even having turnover less than Rs. 40 Lacs would have to gets his Accounts audited......This all i am saying presuming the word 'or' instead of 'and'...
There must be some amendment in Sec. 44AB, which i am yet to find.....If someone is aware of it, please let me know?