banner_ad

Section -152 (6) retiring by rotation

Others 1389 views 8 replies

Hello,

 

Please suggest the correct method/ calculation of director retiring by rotation.

FOR ID -section 149 clearly mention that Independent director shall not retire by rotation so for determing 2/3 to include such director or not .

 

pls suggest wbt MD./ED clarification.

 

regds

Replies (8)

In my view, ID should be excluded ( Ref. Section 149 (13) ) and remaining Directors to be taken into count for calculating 2/3rd of Total Number of Directors whose period of office is liable to retire by rotation unless Articles provide all directors to retire by rotation.

Of the 2/3rd, 1/3rd of Directors shall retire by rotation.

MD & WTD to be excluded in my view for calculation but ED to be taken into count.

Other members views solicited.

 

regards

Santosh Shah

 

 

 

Originally posted by : Desai
Hello,

 

Please suggest the correct method/ calculation of director retiring by rotation.

FOR ID -section 149 clearly mention that Independent director shall not retire by rotation

so for determing 2/3 to include such director or not .

 

pls suggest wbt MD./ED clarification.

 

regds

 

 

Hi as per the new Act, IDs are specifically excluded from liable to retire by rotation....As for the MDs/WTDs the act does not specify anything.....earlier they were excluded from the same.... However, keeping in view the new requirements, the co has 2 options....either include MDs and WTDs in the scope of retire by rotation or appoint such number of directors to fulfill the requirements of the Act.

Hi Vandana

In my view, MD / WTD shall not be liable to retire by rotation because when they get appointed

they shall be through agreement for a fixed period for a term not exceeding 5 years.

WTD is Director on wholetime basis for the company.

Hence their posts shall not be subject to retirement by rotation.

Other members views solicited.

regards

Santosh Shah

 

Originally posted by : Vandana J Doshi
Hi as per the new Act, IDs are specifically excluded from liable to retire by rotation....As for the MDs/WTDs the act does not specify anything.....earlier they were excluded from the same....

However, keeping in view the new requirements, the co has 2 options....either include MDs and WTDs in the scope of retire by rotation or appoint such number of directors to fulfill the requirements of the Act.

 

Hello,

That means if co has 8 directors -one is M.D., Three is ID-

Then the calculation will be -

Option -A

1) Total -8 Directors -2/3 will be 5.33 say 5 Directors and out of 5-1/3 is 1.66 so total 2 directors will be retire by rotation and should not be MD/WD/ID.

Option B

1)  Out of Total 8 Directors- to take only 4 directors (to exclude-1 MD and 3 ID)so 2/3 of  4 is 2.66 say 3 director and 1/3 of 3 is 1 director .  so total 1 director will retire by rotation and it willnot be MD/WD/ID

 

Please suggest  wch option is correct and also suggest when the director is not MD/WD/ID but part of the promoter group -can he be retire ?

 

 

 

Option B is correct in my view.

regards

Santosh Shah

 

 

Originally posted by : Desai
Hello,

That means if co has 8 directors -one is M.D., Three is ID-

Then the calculation will be -

Option -A

1) Total -8 Directors -2/3 will be 5.33 say 5 Directors and out of 5-1/3 is 1.66 so total 2 directors will be retire by rotation and should not be MD/WD/ID.




Option B



1)  Out of Total 8 Directors- to take only 4 directors (to exclude-1 MD and 3 ID)so 2/3 of  4 is 2.66 say 3 director and 1/3 of 3 is 1 director .  so total 1 director will retire by rotation and it willnot be MD/WD/ID

 



Please suggest  wch option is correct and also suggest when the director is not MD/WD/ID but part of the promoter group -can he be retire ?

 

 

 

 

Hi Desai ji....option B is correct......
Santosh ji.....no where in the act it is written that MD/WTD cannot retire by rotation.....it is an interpretation used in general practice.....keeping in the mind the same, if their are sufficient number of directors as given in the example above, MDs/WTDs can be excluded......

Dear Vandana

I agree with you that it is not specifically written in the act where MD/WTD cannot retire by rotation.

However the point which i would like to bring to notice is that, if a MD who is appointed by agreement say for a fixed term for 5 years, and where his office is fixed for such term with the company in carrying out his duties, does it make any meaning of such office of MD liable to retire by rotation?. 

Hence in this aspect, I said the office of MD shall not be taken into count when Directors Retire by rotation.

If Any Different views from Members / Experts on this solicited.

regards

Santosh Shah 

 

Originally posted by : Vandana J Doshi
Santosh ji.....no where in the act it is written that MD/WTD cannot retire by rotation.....it is an interpretation used in general practice.....keeping in the mind the same, if their are sufficient number of directors as given in the example above, MDs/WTDs can be excluded......

 


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
ARTICLESHIP 15 May 2026
Audit Assistant / Article Trainee / Intern

SSGS and Associates

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
09 May 2026
Audit Manager

Kanna and Associates

Coimbatore

CA Inter

View Details
Company
29 May 2026
Company Secretary - Part time

Shaswat initial support private limited

Ahmedabad

CS

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 28 May 2026
Accounts, Audit & Compliance Executive

Shyam Joshi & Associates

Pune

B.Com

View Details
Company
01 June 2026
Audit, Taxation & Compliance Executive

R P S K & Associates

Nashik

CA Inter

View Details
Company
14 May 2026
Financial Analyst - Remote Finance Expert

HiringBridge

Ahmedabad

CA

View Details
Company
23 May 2026
Account Executive

SMJ global advisors pvt ltd

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 27 May 2026
Lead Conversion Executive / Sales Closing Executive

SMJ global advisors pvt ltd

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details