What are disallowance implications u/s 40 A 3 in following case-
Advance of Rs.60000 paid to employee in cash on 2 apr. 2012. Employee pays that cash to hotel for accomodation charges of guests on 4th april 2012.
Kunal Narwadkar (Article) (34 Points)
15 February 2013What are disallowance implications u/s 40 A 3 in following case-
Advance of Rs.60000 paid to employee in cash on 2 apr. 2012. Employee pays that cash to hotel for accomodation charges of guests on 4th april 2012.
CA Neil Ganatra
(Partner - Gautam Joshi & Co.)
(871 Points)
Replied 15 February 2013
It will be disallowed.
Kunal Narwadkar
(Article)
(34 Points)
Replied 18 February 2013
Dipjyoti Majumdar
(CA in service & CS. dipmaj@ rediffmail.com )
(3468 Points)
Replied 18 February 2013
Very good question, Kunal. I shall give an answer, so I am keping this tagged.
Regards,
CS,CA F,Numrologi TusharSampat
(CS CA F Numerologist Astrologer Graphologist Face reader Vastu Expert)
(85930 Points)
Replied 18 February 2013
What is the tax implication if on 1 single day follwing payments are made to diffrent person bt debited to 1 single a/c transport chg a/c.
1)15000 2)14000 3) 15000 Total 44000 (Since limit for disallownace for plying or hiring goods carriage is Rs 35,000) but its made to diff person on 1 single day and also debited n entry booked on 1 single day?
ans soon as its urgent.
Kunal Narwadkar
(Article)
(34 Points)
Replied 18 February 2013
Mr. Tushar,
Disallowance u/s 40 A 3 is for payment above specified limit to SAME PERSON in one single day. payment to diffrent persons in single day is not disallowed. Hence in your case expense will not be disallowed.
CS,CA F,Numrologi TusharSampat
(CS CA F Numerologist Astrologer Graphologist Face reader Vastu Expert)
(85930 Points)
Replied 18 February 2013
Originally posted by : Kunal Narwadkar | ||
Mr. Tushar, Disallowance u/s 40 A 3 is for payment above specified limit to SAME PERSON in one single day. payment to diffrent persons in single day is not disallowed. Hence in your case expense will not be disallowed. |
I agree with ur views bt my question is ITO can always argue that since its paid on 1 day for name sake amount is divided in 3 and falsely shown as paid to 3 different person (though in reality its paid) as its debited to same a/c on same day..then how to prove that as when cash payment is made no supporting documents are available as evidence to argue against this argument of assessing officer.
Kunal Narwadkar
(Article)
(34 Points)
Replied 18 February 2013
In case of unavaliability of supportings ITO will surely Disallow the expense. You should have the acknowledged lorry receipt & bill of Transporter as supporting
Dipjyoti Majumdar
(CA in service & CS. dipmaj@ rediffmail.com )
(3468 Points)
Replied 20 February 2013
Kunal
Coming to your original query, my view is if you give advance to your staff @ 15,000/- each in 4 different days aggregating to 60,000 and then after some days the staff makes a payment of 60,000/- in cash to hotel for accommodation, section 40A(3) is not applicable.
Better you pass accounting entries accordingly, like advance to cash and adjust the advance with hotel expenses.
Regards,
it is advisable to divide 60000 in 4 days with 15000 each.
GST Live Certification Course (39th Batch) - April 2024 (Weekend Batch) (With Certificate)
"Live class on Python for Financial Analysis: Unlocking Efficiency in Accounting and Finance"