An employee take dwelling house for his own use .He paid rent Rs.20000/- PM.
Same rent reimbursed by corporate body company separately, other than regular salary.
As per sec.2(93 ) of CGST Act company acting as an principal agent and it is construed that supply is made to company.
Hence rent paid by employee to landlord , which is reimbursed by co.is liable to pay RCM GST.
Here there is no any contractual agreement between employee and employer for rent.
Is my information is correct
Menu
Sec.2 (93 ) of CGST Act
Replies (3)
But sir , rent paid is debited to rent exp.there is no contractual agreement between employee and employer for rent. Company pay rent to employee indirectly company is recipient and sec.2 (93) says that company is acting as an agent.
In my understanding, it has to be debited to Employee Cost not to Rent paid.
What are the view's of other expert
Recent Topics :
- Category B/D pop up after the file is e verified
- Section 56(2)(x)(xi) applicability to compensation
- How to claim exempt income u/s 10(26) in ITR-1 of
- 63053900 tax rate
- Clubbing of deceased's income
- Which ITR to use
- Sovereign gold bond capital gain
- In TDS section no column for relationship in itr
- Query related to agricultural income of Trust
- Full & Final Settlement — what changed u
Related Topics :
CAclubindia
