banner_ad

Sc decision on aadhaar card

Others 240 views 2 replies

The Supreme Court today stayed the government's order to make Aadhaar card mandatory for PAN holders and said it can't be made mandatory for filing Income Tax returns. However, the apex court added that those who have Aadhaar must provide its details while filing Income Tax returns.

The top court was hearing a batch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of a provision in the Income Tax Act making Aadhaar mandatory for filing income tax returns and allotment of PAN.

"The primary Aadhaar act is voluntary for people, the subsequent amendment to the IT Act cannot make it mandatory. The Supreme Court's interim order permitted Aadhaar to be used only for PDS schemes, it can not be extended for I-T Act," Arvind Dattar, arguing for petitioners told the Supreme Court.

A bench comprising Justices A K Sikri and Ashok Bhushan had on May 4 reserved the verdict on the pleas, challenging section 139AA of the Income Tax (I-T) Act, which was introduced through the latest budget and the Finance Act, 2017.

Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act provides for mandatory quoting of Aadhaar or enrollment ID of Aadhaar application form for filing of income tax returns and making application for allotment of PAN (Permanent Account Number) with effect from July 1 this year.

While opposing the government's move, the petitioners, including CPI leader Binoy Viswam, have contended before the bench that the Centre cannot "belittle" the apex court's 2015 order holding the unique identification number as voluntary.

They argued that government should not have enacted section 139AA in the Act to make Aadhaar mandatory for PAN as the apex court's five-judge bench order was clear that Aadhaar was voluntary and not mandatory.

However, the Centre had contended that Aadhaar was made mandatory for allotment of PAN to weed out fake cards which were used for terror financing and circulation of black money.

Does that mean that linking Aadhaar with PAn is mandatory now?

Replies (2)
we need to read the judgment once it comes in. It appears that there is some sort of misreading of the judgment. If if a person having Aadhar card is mandatorily required to link Aadhar with PAN then the spirit of the whole judgment will go out. It will also mean it is mandatory for persons having Aadhar and not mandatory for persons having no Aadhar. then where is the question of it being voluntary. I think there is some sort of musreporting going on in the news media. lets read the judgment first.
we need to read the judgment once it comes in. It appears that there is some sort of misreading of the judgment. If if a person having Aadhar card is mandatorily required to link Aadhar with PAN then the spirit of the whole judgment will go out. It will also mean it is mandatory for persons having Aadhar and not mandatory for persons having no Aadhar. then where is the question of it being voluntary. I think there is some sort of musreporting going on in the news media. lets read the judgment first.


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Related Topics
Loading
Company
23 May 2026
Account Executive

SMJ global advisors pvt ltd

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
19 May 2026
Accountant

ca kunjan

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
16 May 2026
Account & Audit Asst

RAHUL KHANDEBHARAD & ASSOCIATES

Nashik

B.Com

View Details
Company
14 May 2026
Senior Associate

ABHISHEK SHANKAR AGARWAL & ASSOCIATES

Kolkata

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 31 May 2026
Article Assistant

KPRS And Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
29 May 2026
Accounts assistant

Shubh Consultancy

Mumbai

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 04 June 2026
Article

Rakhecha & Co.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
01 June 2026
Audit, Taxation & Compliance Executive

R P S K & Associates

Nashik

CA Inter

View Details