banner_ad

Salary paid for last year as arrears.

Tax queries 1060 views 5 replies

A company makes provision for increase in salary for FY 2013-14 and does not makes payment for some reason.

This amount will be paid in FY 2014-15 to the employees.

Employees can claim the rebate u/s 89.

what is the tax treatment for the company on this provision and payment in next year?

 

Replies (5)

Dear archana

when arrears amount is received, employees will get rebate under sec 89 and it will be allowed as deduction to the company as expenses made on salaries of employees. 

Regards

But Mr. Manoj. Will the payment be considered a prior year expenditure, because it relates to previous years.???

Dear supreeth if they have made provisions for the arrears then their is no problem.

Dear please refer to case 

Cit vs Hindustan Times on 14 September, 2012

which says as following regarding Salary/wages arrears (when received due to revision made by the govt. in wages/salary)

"A careful analysis of the main provision would reveal that the nature of expenses, i.e. arrears of salary and other benefits payable to employees, is not covered by Section 43-B at all. Such liabilities are not contributions to provident fund, superannuation or any other fund or plan which the employer is obliged to extend to its employees to fulfill its statutory or contractual obligations. The character of the amounts in this case is pure and simple arrears of wages, which were directed to be paid as a result of wage revision exercise mandated by an award. There is no doubt that the liability arose during the year covered by the Assessment Year. However, the award itself required payment in installments. It is not as if the assessee voluntarily deposited the amounts, when they were not payable, or claimed it when no such liabilities existed as a matter of fact. Having regard to these facts, the Court is of opinion that the Tribunal was justified in holding that the liabilities arising out of the Monesana Wage Board award were justifiably deductible as expenditure, and not covered by Section 43-B. "

hence we can claim such expenses.

Regards

 

Thanks for the valuable reply. I have one more doubt.

For the purpose of actuarial valuation of employee benefits, is that appropriate to consider the salary without the provision.

Because the provision is adhoc amount and it cant be allocated to individual employees.

 


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
ARTICLESHIP 31 May 2026
Article Assistant

KPRS And Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
09 June 2026
Accounts Associate

S Madan and CO

New Delhi

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
16 May 2026
Account & Audit Asst

RAHUL KHANDEBHARAD & ASSOCIATES

Nashik

B.Com

View Details
Company
27 May 2026
Audit Assitant

Virender K Gupta and Co

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 27 May 2026
Lead Conversion Executive / Sales Closing Executive

SMJ global advisors pvt ltd

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
26 May 2026
Senior Accountant cum purchase Manager

Vardhaman Group of India

Pimpri Chinchwad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
07 June 2026
Tax Associate

Rajkumar Jain & Co.

Ahmedabad

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 17 May 2026
CA Article /Trainee

Malik Sunil & co

New Delhi

CA Foundation

View Details