Question on Contract Act!

No, because while entering into the contract there was no intent to enter into a legal relationship. (This qs appeared in PE-II law exam in May 2005, you can check suggested Qs&Ans for the same).

 i think he prefers to check us before his study

no he can't do it as their is no legal agreement between them.

as it is all personal and no legal relationship he cannot file a suit against his father.

Firstly i would like to say very very good question.. hahahahha

As per the indian contract act,1872.

Consideration is required. So, as per law there is no benefit to the second party.

If son passed his in first attempt . father will not get any beneift

So he cant suit against him

As well as its a social contract and social contract is not covered by indian contract act,1872

Ruchika Gupta was right! 

i checked out the answers. It had the same solution. Thanx

since no intention is there to creat legal enforceability, hence, it is not a contract a the very first place, no question of filing suit.........

It's not enforceable by law, it's mutual understanding between father and son and also natural love and affection, it's void from the begining ''ABINITIO",

As per the indian contract act,1872.

Consideration is required. So, as per law there is no benefit to the FATHER.

If son passed his in first attempt . father will not get any beneift

So he can't suE his father.

As well as its a social contract and social contract is not covered by indian contract act,1872.

i need a case study on indian contract act

since there is no intention to create legal relation ship it is  not enforceable