banner_ad

mistake in may 2010 suggested answer of fm cap budgting

IPCC 951 views 2 replies
in may 2010 fm paper one question from cap budgting calculate npv discounted payback period and irr. 2 machine is given under consideration one life is 5 year and 2 ki life 6 year. This the mutually exclusive proposal. As per npv technique when mutually exclusive proposal is given and life of the proposal under consideration is nt same and both cash inflow and outflow is given than proposal having highes equvijant npv will be chosen bt in suggested only npv calculated nt equvilant npv plz help me ki kya main galat hun ya institute se mistake hui hai?
Replies (2)

In my opinion, u are right..it should not be NPV.

Dear Friend, In my opinion, when there are two mutually exclusive events,and also when the life of the projects are not same, for deciding the project, we should ascertain that by (i) Equated Annual Benefit Method or (2) Equated Cost Method. If there are sunk costs or no cost data available we can use EAB Method.


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
ARTICLESHIP 15 May 2026
Audit Assistant / Article Trainee / Intern

SSGS and Associates

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
22 May 2026
U.S. Financial Reporting & Consolidation Manager

Karia Overseas

Ahmedabad

CA

View Details
Company
14 May 2026
Senior Accounts Executive

Karan Gupta & Co.

New Delhi

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
19 May 2026
Accountant

ca kunjan

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 28 May 2026
SEMI QUALIFIED/ CA DROPOUTS/ ARTICLES

T R SOOD & CO

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
29 May 2026
Finance Head

Bhawar Sales Corporation

Chennai

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
24 May 2026
Accounts & Tax Executive

PARAS KHURANA AND CO

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
14 May 2026
Financial Analyst - Remote Finance Expert

HiringBridge

Ahmedabad

CA

View Details