Manipulation of results

Others 1112 views 7 replies

Pranjal

Student CA IPC / IPCC

531 Points Joined March 2007

There was a rumour in the market that the CA results are controlled or to be precise manipulated in tune with the market demand. Some agreed while others mostly those who have acquired the coveted degree disagree. But after going through Section 39 of Chartered Accountants' Regulation,1988 the rumour becomes certain.It states that that the Result of Exams should be declared in the following Manner

1. (a) A list of candidates declared successful at each examination shall be published

(b) The names of candidates obtaining distinction in the examination shall be indicated in the list

(c) Every candidate shall be individually informed of his result.

2. The Council may, in its discretion, REVISE THE MARKS obtained by all candidates or a section of candidates in any particular paper or papers or in the aggregate in such manner as may be considered necessary, for maintaining the standards of pass percentage provided in these Regulations.

I'm not posting the message to create confusion in the minds of my fellow students. I'm just seeking the opinions of all regarding the issue. The opinions of members will be most welcomed.

Replies (7)

Ajay kumar

assistant

481 Points Joined July 2009

This is ture sir NOV 2009 results should be banned and checked by C.I .D of india.

Nitin Singhal

Gaining knowledge...

320 Points Joined September 2009

This is not a rumour. It is in fact TRUE fact known to most of the students. And as far as Council or institute is concerned, they will never say that it is so. because if they say so how will they be able to promote CA course.

Sivanesh Rajendran

Articled Assistant

49 Points Joined November 2008

Its true Mr. Panjal regulation 39 from the Chartered Accountants Regulations, 1988 really has such a clause.

Inorder to prove itself, ICAI should remove regulation 39 from the Chartered Accountants Regulations, 1988. Else the whole examination system will be just a eye wash.

How can an respectable institute like ICAI afford to have such a clause to revise the marks of Students Arbitrarily like this?

rahul

student

27 Points Joined February 2010

c.a. p.e. II result was not good from my centre from last two attempts i.e. june 2009 and nov 2009 . none student had got exemption in any paper of any of group of p.e. II result of june 2009. and none student had got passed in first group from last two consequently attempts. from alwar branch rajasthan.

Pranjal

Student CA IPC / IPCC

531 Points Joined March 2007

Thank you all for sharing your view points.But opinions of CA s & those who are associated with affairs of the Institute will be most welcomed. After toiling with syallabus,managing studies with articles & work,going through heart piercing comments from certain peoples after failing to pass,is this that is in store for us?. If this is an well accepted fact then why we are here?. Don't the sincerty of those who writes the exams should be paid off. I know saying such things will land in deaf ears but those who are at the helm of affairs should also remember the fact that they too also might have passed through such ordeals before getting the coveted degree barring a lucky few. If they thinks that since we got such things all the future aspirants should also get the same then it's a different story. In short the fate of the students should be left to the fact as to how they fared in those crucial 3 hours and not to such arbitary sections.