PRACTICING COMPANY SECRETARY
28 Points
Joined January 2009
Dear All,
This Section 314 is a very important section so far as we PCS are concerned especially in case of a private limited company.
I went through the interesting discussions and views in this forum.
My view in this matter is as follows, experts please correct me if I'm wrong:
Section 314 (1) requires Sp. Resolution in Gen. Meeting where remuneration is paid to DIRECTOR (over and above his/her remuneration as director) or PERSONS RELATED TO DIRECTOR of Rs.50000/- pm (any amount) or more (enhanced from Rs.10000/- pm earlier).
Section 314 (1B) (please note the difference) requires CENTRAL GOVERNMENT APPROVAL where remuneration is paid to PERSONS RELATED TO DIRECTOR (again please note the difference) of Rs.250000/- pm or more (enhanced from Rs.20000/- pm earlier).
It is therefore, not required for a Director to obtain Cent. Govt. Approval for remuneration of any amount-however Sp. Res. is a must if his/her remuneration is Rs.50000/- pm or more.
For Persons Related to a Director (earlier there was a debate whether this meant a Director holding Off of Profit, which was settled by SC decision), the appointment/remuneration needs to be approved by Sp. Resolution passed by shareholders in general meeting if his/her remuenration is Rs.50000/- pm or more PLUS CENTRAL GOVERNMENT APPROVAL if this remuneration is Rs.250000/- pm or more.
Also, in case of a director Section 314 (1) applies if remueration is paid for remuneration over and above that as a director. This is a very grey area as it has not been clearly defined in the Act nor by precedents what remuneration as a director means as a director can/will also be handling day-to-day business.
The jury is still out-this continues to remain a grey area. It is a good thing, however, that MCA has finally realised that their earlier limits were ridiculously low (Rs.10,000/- pm & Rs.20,000/- pm).