Manager (Indirect Taxes)
821 Points
Joined January 2011
Looking from bank's point of view also it seems that there is no default on the part of the bank. Bank is not responsible to see whether or not the service tax is collected by the receiver of rent. In absence of any specific provisions in Service tax law in your case, service tax has to be deposited by receiver of rent only. Just by inserting a clause in the lease deed, one can not play with the service tax provisions and shift the liability to pay service tax to another person. Service Tax is required to be deposited under Service Tax Registration Number of output service provider only, in your case it is the receiver of rent. It is possible that bank pays service tax on behalf of the receiver of rent under service provider's registration number, but that is an arrangement between the bank & the receiver of rent. Liability to pay would always be with the service provider. In case of default, proceeding would be carried out against service provider under the provisions of Service Tax. Where service provider has not charged service tax separately, whatever is received by him would be treated as gross amount received inclusive of service tax and tax will be ascertained by reverse calculation.
Depending on the terms of the agreement between the parties, bank may also deposit the tax on behalf of lessor, but under lessor's registration number as he is the provider of service.