LAW PAPER

mine ws gud....regretting 4 my slow speed as i lost 16 marks straightaway.....still superb...xpctin 60+

Rite or Wrong One thing about it is that its over study for nxt paper 

Cool guys..paper was good..and gandhi ji added me 4marks to my paper..i again thank himm..

what is the answer of  the compulsory first question???

I cant tell how the paper was cause I hadn't prepared :) was writing everything outta common sense. Examiner's sure to get pissed off! :)

1 a - Rs.60,000 => contention is not valid

b1 no idea

b2i void

b2ii one contract

b2iii express contract

c no relief

d1i incorrect.same as rtp nov 10

d1ii correct

d2i 20

d2ii 5

d2iii c

 

b2iii  tacit not express contract 

d2i  50 and not 20

Gandhi ji social sin are in 1st chaptr of ethics, hw can u drop ths qus, it already come in PCC(Exm) see back year qus.....

i made a good attempt as of my knowledge...hoping for exemption

Originally posted by : Wasi Khan

Puneet, was the first question was from Pledge??? found it tricky??

yeaah first question was from pledge.....rights of pledgee

I think for this law paper we should take some time and applaud the paper setter.......the practicals were good and tricky really compelled us to use our brains......i guess for this november 2010 group 1 they are focusing on one principle that is IF THE CONCEPTS OF STUDENTS ARE NOT CLEAR WE ARE NOT LETTING THEM PASSS :P

i really liked the gratuity act's practical was tricky even the contract act was equally tricky

social sins question was from the introduction of first chapter , even the trusteeship quote was of gandhiji :P

Originally posted by : APOORV SAXENA

hey guyzz...pls temme 1 thing....Q4 (c), it asked forms of formal communication....bt i think it should b forms of informal communication (gossip, cluster etc. )

 

am i rite or wrong ??

no...it was forms of formal comm....ie. downward,upward,diagonal and horizontal....

paper was average! but far more better than that of accounts, but i had done 1 mistake i had attempted the whole paper for 116 marks!!! now scared that examiner should no get irritated of that and cut my marks??????????????????????????

social  Sins by mahatma gandhi ji

1-Bura mat bolo

2-Bura mat suno

3-Bura mat dekho

 

Some answer of IPCC law paper

1(a)Rs.60,000 => contention is not valid

1(c) Companies action is not valid, Z entitled for relief

1(d)(II)(i)50

6(a)P will not succeed in recovering full amount, can recover Rs. 7000 only.

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Related Topics :

Loading
Company
ARTICLESHIP 04 September 2026
Accounts Executive

Hema Yashwanth & Associates

Chennai

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 25 August 2026
CA Article's

Saini Pati Shah & Co LLP

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 10 August 2026
Article Assistant

Suraj Garg and Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 17 August 2026
CA Article Trainee

ASC Group

Noida

CA Inter

View Details
Company
25 August 2026
Senior Accountant

MG Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 17 August 2026
Article Assistant

Jain Ankit and Co

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
11 August 2026
Chartered Accountant

Aviv Global Pvt Ltd

Ahmedabad

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 26 August 2026
CA Article Assistant/CA Drop Out/Accounts Executive

PARV & Co.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details