Menu
Indirect taxes
In Usha Rectifier case Supreme Court held as "Demand - Deemed removal - Testing equipment manufactured for captive use - Contention that goods not taken out from premises, hence no duty leviable - Explanation to Rules 9 and 49 of erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944 provide that excisable goods manufactured and consumed or utilised as such deemed to have been removed - Duty payable - Sections 3 and 11A of Central Excise Act, 1944"
67/95 was not existing at that time
Raksh*t
09810525780
advrcverma @ gmail.com
In Usha Rectifier case Supreme Court held as "Demand - Deemed removal - Testing equipment manufactured for captive use - Contention that goods not taken out from premises, hence no duty leviable - Explanation to Rules 9 and 49 of erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944 provide that excisable goods manufactured and consumed or utilised as such deemed to have been removed - Duty payable - Sections 3 and 11A of Central Excise Act, 1944"
67/95 was not existing at that time
Raksh*t
09810525780
advrcverma @ gmail.com
Recent Topics :
- Free CA Foundation Study Material - PYQs with Sugg
- INCOME TAX
- Moving from old to new tax regime after notice
- Need urgent help on notice
- ITR-3 - F&O Loss adjusted against business inc
- Error - Blank Rows in Schedule SI (ITR-2)
- Dividend from co-operative society
- SECTION 139(10) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 CASE
- TDS u/s.194C returns filed in ITR-1
- TDS on Property - Form 26QB Related
Related Topics :
CAclubindia
