Menu
Indirect taxes
In Usha Rectifier case Supreme Court held as "Demand - Deemed removal - Testing equipment manufactured for captive use - Contention that goods not taken out from premises, hence no duty leviable - Explanation to Rules 9 and 49 of erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944 provide that excisable goods manufactured and consumed or utilised as such deemed to have been removed - Duty payable - Sections 3 and 11A of Central Excise Act, 1944"
67/95 was not existing at that time
Raksh*t
09810525780
advrcverma @ gmail.com
In Usha Rectifier case Supreme Court held as "Demand - Deemed removal - Testing equipment manufactured for captive use - Contention that goods not taken out from premises, hence no duty leviable - Explanation to Rules 9 and 49 of erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944 provide that excisable goods manufactured and consumed or utilised as such deemed to have been removed - Duty payable - Sections 3 and 11A of Central Excise Act, 1944"
67/95 was not existing at that time
Raksh*t
09810525780
advrcverma @ gmail.com
Recent Threads
- Inverted Rate structure .
- Exemption to be climed
- GST TDS u/s 51 Applicability on RBI and it's subs
- Time allowed to buy another asset
- ITR not processed for the FY 2024-25
- Gift of money to my wife.
- Tax Audit If you show Loss
- GST Tax invoice Value Rs..234000
- Can I claim benefit under 54F if I sell my equity
- Income tax refund 25/26
Related Threads
CAclubindia
