Menu
Indirect taxes
In Usha Rectifier case Supreme Court held as "Demand - Deemed removal - Testing equipment manufactured for captive use - Contention that goods not taken out from premises, hence no duty leviable - Explanation to Rules 9 and 49 of erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944 provide that excisable goods manufactured and consumed or utilised as such deemed to have been removed - Duty payable - Sections 3 and 11A of Central Excise Act, 1944"
67/95 was not existing at that time
Raksh*t
09810525780
advrcverma @ gmail.com
In Usha Rectifier case Supreme Court held as "Demand - Deemed removal - Testing equipment manufactured for captive use - Contention that goods not taken out from premises, hence no duty leviable - Explanation to Rules 9 and 49 of erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944 provide that excisable goods manufactured and consumed or utilised as such deemed to have been removed - Duty payable - Sections 3 and 11A of Central Excise Act, 1944"
67/95 was not existing at that time
Raksh*t
09810525780
advrcverma @ gmail.com
Recent Topics :
- On which amount 200% penalty under section 270A is
- RECEIVED INTIMATION U/S 399 FOR TDS PAYMENT ON PRO
- How do CA firms track SEBI/AMFI circulars and dead
- Jurisdictional validity of Sec 148 notice after fa
- Taxable Income or Not
- GST Input Tax Credit (ITC) on Camera Purchase &
- What makes CA Himanshu Singla different from other
- TAX TREATMENT AND ACCOUNTING ENTRIEOF PERQUISITES
- Gifting money to my father-in-law (my husband's da
- GSTR-1 JSON from marketplace exports (Myntra / Ama
Related Topics :
CAclubindia
