Help me out ....

CS 1031 views 6 replies

It's almost 1.5 month r8 now ...since m struck wid SEBI ..... 

can u plz help me a bit and elaboate these terms wid simple examples ...

  1. Settlement of delivery on net basis
  2. Repo transactions
  3. dutch auction
  4. funds pay in
  5. funds pay out
  6. TWS

I'm nt getting other things which m nt conceptually clear ... I have further doubts as well .........................

 

Plz don't say just do d scanner ... bcz I can't mug up until I can't understand those terms ..I need a clear picture of whatever I m reading ..and If I didn't do that ...I knw my mind will struck on those points alone... so plz ans asap...

 

Regards

Renu

Replies (6)

DUTCH AUCTION

 

A Dutch auction is a method for pricing shares (often in an initial public offering) whereby the price of the shares offered is lowered until there are enough bids to sell all shares. All the shares are then sold at that price. 

How It Works/Example:

The goal of a Dutch auction is the find the optimal price at which to sell a security. 

For example, let's assume Company XYZ wants to sell 10 million shares using a Dutch auction. To participate in a Dutch auction, an investor typically opens an account with Company XYZ's underwriter (usually an investment bank), obtains a prospectus, and obtains an access code or bidder identification code (Dutch auctions often occur online). 

During bidding, investors indicate how many shares they're willing to buy and the price they're willing to pay. The underwriter, who acts as the auctioneer, usually starts the auction by offering a prohibitively high price for the security (say, $40 per share in this case). It then lowers the price gradually to say, $36 per share, where two bids come in for 500,000 shares. The underwriter then lowers the price again, this time to $35, and attracts 4,000,000 shares worth of bids. After lowering the price to $34, the underwriter gets another 5,000,000 shares worth of bids; then the underwriter lowers the price to $33 and gets another 3,000,000 in bids before the auction ends. 

Below is a table summarizing Company XYZ's Dutch auction:

dutch auction definition and example

When the auction closes, the underwriters calculate the highest price at which all shares will be sold. Here, the underwriter wound up with bids for 13 million shares, but the highest bids adding up to 10 million shares are the winning bids in a Dutch auction. The underwriter will then set the price equal to the lowest winning price bid on those 10 million shares (in this case, $34), and all the winning bidders will pay that price. (Dutch auctions are largely handled by computer, and the bids are not compared until the auction time has expired.) Note that this $34 price applies to all bidders, even the ones that bid $36 or $35.

Why It Matters:

Normally, the price of shares in an IPO is set by an investment bank after conducting several valuation calculations and talking to potential investors. But a Dutch auction is theoretically more efficient at finding the "right" price that equates supply and demand. 

Supporters of the Dutch auction method say that small investors get more access to IPOs because the traditional offering process involves investment banks funneling IPO shares to their best clients, who reap quick profits (assuming the stock price rises). But some analysts theorize that buyers pay more for stock sold in Dutch auctions because under the traditional method investment banks typically underprice offerings to make sure all the shares sell. Also, they say shareholders benefit when shares are sold using traditional methods because the initial spike often associated with traditional IPOs creates an image of success that drives the stock even higher. This is one reason shares sold in a Dutch auction don't usually have the same run-up in price immediately after they begin trading.

The U.S. Treasury uses the Dutch auction method to sell Treasury securities, and many U.S. companies use the method for share buybacks.

Regards,

Aditya

Repo Transactions

A Repo transaction is defined as a transaction wherein the securities are sold at a particular price by one party(Seller) to the other (Buyer) with commitments on the Seller’s part to repurchase the equivalent securities from the buyer (and a corresponding commitment on the part of the Buyer to sell the equivalent securities back to seller) on a certain date and at a certain price, both such date and price being fixed as a part of the same transaction. Securities are equivalent to other securities for the purpose of this framework , if they are (i ) of the same issuer; (ii) part of the same issue; and (iii) are of identical type, nominal value, descripttion as those other securities.

Repos will fall within the definition of 'investments' as far as the purchaser of securities is concerned since the title of the securities bought is transferred to the buyer.

Participants in the repo market should at all times treat the names of parties to transactions as confidential.

Participants should know their counterparties and will maintain records of their conversion – both internal or with the investor – material to their relationship. Where these are in written form, records must be kept in line with statutory requirements.

Participants must accept responsibility for the actions of their staff and all participants must ensure that any individual of one institution who commits to any other institution does so within authority.

Personnel in back office functions should be functionally separate from those in the front office. Persons who conclude trades shall not be involved in the confirmation or settlement of deals.

Deals recorded by the trader should be confirmed independently by the back office in all details recorded by the trader. Back office must respond immediately to confirmations received for which they do not have a

Experience has shown that recourse to tapes proves invaluable to the speedy resolution of differences and disputes. Tapes relating to disputed transactions should be retained until the problem is resolved.

All firms, whether acting as principals, agent or broker, have a duty to make absolutely clear whether the prices they are quoting are firm or corresponding trade. Also, there is need to define the time by which confirmation should be returned. Exceptions should be brought to the attention of management by back office and the management should satisfy themselves of the genuineness of the trade. Prices quoted by brokers should be taken as indicative unless otherwise qualified.

The principals should regard themselves as bound to deal once the price, name acceptability, credit approved and any other key commercial terms have been agreed. Original agreements are considered binding.

The written confirmation provides a necessary final safeguard against dealing errors. Conformations should be dispatched and checked promptly, even when oral deal checks have been undertaken. The issue of checking of confirmation should be a back office responsibility which should be carried out independently from those who initiate deals.

Participants should act with due skill, care and diligence and to facilitate the same staff should be properly training in the practices of the repo market. Also, they should be familiar with this code.

The market participants should pay particular attention to ensuring fair treatment for their clients especially where conflicts of interest cannot be avoided.

Participants should ensure that they are eligible, legally to undertake repo transactions and have obtained all the required permissions from their regulatory authorities, wherever required for the purpose.

Where a custodian undertakes a repo transaction on a client, if and when explicitly permitted by the regulatory authority, the provisions given in the operational guidelines for Constituents’ SGL Account by RBI will be kept in view as far as transactions in Government securities are concerned. This is apart from obtaining the necessary authority for this activity from the client in a clear legal agreement stating therein the terms and conditions for undertaking the transaction.

Participants should ensure that they have adequate systems and control with a view to satisfying that any repo transactions have been properly authorised before cash or stock is released, adequate documentation to over the types of transactions are undertaken and appropriate accounting systems in general and taxation treatment in particular are followed.

Repo transactions should be subject to a legal agreement between the two participants concerned. A Master Repurchase Agreement should be used for this purpose. The agreement should provide for the absolute transfer of title to securities, daily marking to market of transactions, appropriate initial margin and for the maintenance of margins whenever the mark to market reveals a material change of value, the events of default and consequential rights and obligations of the counterparties, clarification on rights of the parties regarding substitution of collateral and the treatment of coupon and interest payments in respect of securities subject to it etc.

Suitable initial margins as per norms laid down by the regulatory authority should be reflected in the transaction apart from daily margins as required for essential protection for participants in repo transactions. Collateral including where relevant margins should be delivered to the account of the counterparty or his agent or a designated third party.

 The dealing hours will have to be uniform and as stipulated by the regulatory authority. In cases where deals are undertaken outside of these hours the management should satisfy themselves that there were good reasons for concluding deals after prescribed dealing hours.

Regards,

Aditya

Pay in funds

When an investor buys shares the shares are deposited in to their respective dematerialized accounts i.e.Demat accounts and the buyer or the investor has to pay the broker the price of his purchase.The broker pays that funds to NSCCL because that is where he has purchased his securities or shares from.

The process of equities getting deposited into the Buyers Demat account is called Pay-in of securities and the funds i.e.the money paid by the buyer for his purchase to the broker gets deposited into NSCCL the process of funds getting deposited is called Pay-in of funds.

The time period for pay-in of funds is T+2 working days i.e. 2 working days after the trade took place.

Regards,

Aditya

@ Aditya ... I also read the same example as u hav given in dutch auction .....

I already got d ans till next morning on fb  ...

thanks for answering my qs :)

Dear REENU,

Welcome after all. I could only find those examples which i posted. If i would find any more, would share with you for sure.

and as i came to know that you are on fb, why dont you join me there?

my id is:

adisoniadi @ rediffmail.com

wish to see you there.

 

Regards,

Aditya.

thanks for sharing this..


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register