During scrutiny, GST Officials ask to produce Undertaking from Service Providers [ in absence of 2017 bills etc] that they paid tax and invoice was wrongly reported under B2C category / incorrectly reported in GSTR 1 of respective month instead of B2B category. Does this make sense? If undertaking goes wrong, who will be held responsible? Is there any other alternative? Kindly advise.
Menu
GST SCRUTINY
Replies (4)
Quick Summary
Yes, the GST officer is correct. The CBIC has notified this procedure which needs to be carried out in case the input of up to Rs. 2.5 lacs related to F.Y. 17-18 is not showing in GSTR- 2A of the taxpayer .
In case of any further queries, kindly mail me at casoravgupta @ gmail.com
Thanks & Regards
CA. Sorav Gupta
(Practicing Chartered Accountant)
It's 5 lacs, not 2.5 lacs. For less than 5 lacs, declaration from the supplier is required whereas for 5 lacs and above, a certificate from a CA is to be produced.
Many thanks.
Would you please share circular regarding requirement of CA or statutory auditor certificate.
Service provider is still clueless. They feel based on Proforma Invoice, service receiver paid the amount and new series Invoice ref for same amount was uploaded on portal. Thus there is a mismatch. How to fix it as all employees are new and hearing is fixed on 13 Mar.
Please see Circular No. 183/22-GST for details.
Recent Topics :
- Short Deduction
- Large mismatch between AIS Business Receipts and G
- Income tax on Australian Stipendiary Steward on 3
- INCOME TAX SECTION 92E
- Queries on Tax Invoice and GST
- Income Tax Auditor Tenure for Small Companies
- Sec 8 company sec 12ab reg
- AIS Password: How to Open Your AIS PDF?
- Interview Questions
- ITR Filing Last Date 2026
Related Topics :
CAclubindia
