During scrutiny, GST Officials ask to produce Undertaking from Service Providers [ in absence of 2017 bills etc] that they paid tax and invoice was wrongly reported under B2C category / incorrectly reported in GSTR 1 of respective month instead of B2B category. Does this make sense? If undertaking goes wrong, who will be held responsible? Is there any other alternative? Kindly advise.
Menu
GST SCRUTINY
Replies (4)
Yes, the GST officer is correct. The CBIC has notified this procedure which needs to be carried out in case the input of up to Rs. 2.5 lacs related to F.Y. 17-18 is not showing in GSTR- 2A of the taxpayer .
In case of any further queries, kindly mail me at casoravgupta @ gmail.com
Thanks & Regards
CA. Sorav Gupta
(Practicing Chartered Accountant)
It's 5 lacs, not 2.5 lacs. For less than 5 lacs, declaration from the supplier is required whereas for 5 lacs and above, a certificate from a CA is to be produced.
Many thanks.
Would you please share circular regarding requirement of CA or statutory auditor certificate.
Service provider is still clueless. They feel based on Proforma Invoice, service receiver paid the amount and new series Invoice ref for same amount was uploaded on portal. Thus there is a mismatch. How to fix it as all employees are new and hearing is fixed on 13 Mar.
Please see Circular No. 183/22-GST for details.
Recent Topic
- Resale of under construction Residential Flat part
- What would be my Salary
- Damage good
- INCOME TAX RETURN
- Form 10E doubt
- LTCG on property sale after 24jul2024
- Should we mention NET INCOME or GROSS INCOME in i
- CRYPTO - SETOFF
- WBAAR: No Reclaim of Reversed ITC under Section 16
- Why Do Companies Prefer SME IPO Even When They Qua
Related Topics
CAclubindia
