In Sec.23(1)(c), it is provided that in case the actual rent recieved (ARR)is less than the expected rent (ER) "owing to vacancy", then ARR shall be taken as annual value.
but i want to know if the ARR is already less than ER even if rent of vacancy period is to be included in the ARR, then what value is to be taken.
V.K. Singhnia points out that in the latter case, the ER should be taken but the loss due to vacancy shall be deducted from that amount.
for instance..............
ARR (6000x10) = 60000
ER = 75000
Rent of vacancy period (2 mnths) = 12000
even if Rs.12000 is added to ARR,
then also it comes out to be Rs.72000 which is in itself less than ER.
that means the vacancy period hasn't had any effect on the ER.
which value to be taken?
as per V.K. Singhania, the Annual value will be Rs.63000 [75000-12000(loss of vacancy)].
Sec.23(1) (c) doesn't provide for the deduction of any loss of vacancy..
kud u pls clear the above point....
Even circular no.14/2001 which is in this regard kud not be of help....
Menu
Difficulty in Sec.23(1)(c)..........
Replies (1)
| Originally posted by :Ashish | ||
| " | In Sec.23(1)(c), it is provided that in case the actual rent recieved (ARR)is less than the expected rent (ER) "owing to vacancy", then ARR shall be taken as annual value. but i want to know if the ARR is already less than ER even if rent of vacancy period is to be included in the ARR, then what value is to be taken. V.K. Singhnia points out that in the latter case, the ER should be taken but the loss due to vacancy shall be deducted from that amount. for instance.............. ARR (6000x10) = 60000 ER = 75000 Rent of vacancy period (2 mnths) = 12000 even if Rs.12000 is added to ARR, then also it comes out to be Rs.72000 which is in itself less than ER. that means the vacancy period hasn't had any effect on the ER. which value to be taken? as per V.K. Singhania, the Annual value will be Rs.63000 [75000-12000(loss of vacancy)]. Sec.23(1) (c) doesn't provide for the deduction of any loss of vacancy.. kud u pls clear the above point.... Even circular no.14/2001 which is in this regard kud not be of help.... |
" |
hello,
sec.23(1) if ARR is less than ER due to Vacant then it should be ARR will be G.A.V,
but in any othe reason ARR or ER which ever is more should me Taken, So, IF ER is more than ARR then ER will G.A.V (Gross Annual Value)
ER 75000 /-
ARR 72000/-
G.A.V (WHICH EVER IS GREATER SHOULD ME TAKEN) = 75000/-
Recent Topic
- INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT: DOUBLE STANDARDS
- ITR-4,under presumptive Taxation
- TDS data mismatch with SFT
- Resale of under construction Residential Flat part
- What would be my Salary
- Damage good
- INCOME TAX RETURN
- Form 10E doubt
- LTCG on property sale after 24jul2024
- Should we mention NET INCOME or GROSS INCOME in i
Related Topics
CAclubindia
