CCI Online Learning
What do you want to learn today?
     
CIBIL

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Difference in ITR values and computor processed values u/s 143(1)


Malhar Deshpande   09 December 2019

Malhar Deshpande

 4 likes  209 points

| My Other Post

Sir, 

Recently I received intimation u/s 143(1) in that  I have some queries. In ITR2 all values in Capital gain sheet was filled correctly and LTCG u/s 112A was automaticaly populated. but in intimation u/s 143(1) the cost of aquisition was not considered by cpc system.and the full value of consideration itself was taken as capital gain. full consideration = 270583 cost of aquisition =249611 Expense = 1353. so the capital gain auto populated was 19619 and total taxable gain was 0 as it is below 1 lac. But in intimation u/s 143(1) they have shown 270583 as capital gain and cost of acquisition as 0 and variance as -249611. Ofcourse there is no tax payable but I want to know where is the mistake. 

avater

sabyasachi mukherjee   09 December 2019

sabyasachi mukherjee

 140 likes  3871 points

View Profile | My Other Post

@ Malhar
there is no error from your side.
log into efiling website.
find out whether there is any outstanding demand.
if not chk if there is any rectification .
sec 143(1) is invoked in the following cases:
it's an intimation and not scrutiny assesment.

1 Like
avater

Rajan Kumar   10 December 2019

Rajan Kumar

 4 likes  55 points

View Profile | My Other Post

File rectification u/s 154

avater

Malhar Deshpande   10 December 2019

Malhar Deshpande

 4 likes  209 points

View Profile | My Other Post

But there is no tax demand for it. Tax payable is zero.

avater

rama krishnan   11 December 2019

rama krishnan

 963 likes  10495 points

View Profile | My Other Post

There's a heresy that cpc intentionally doesn't give credit to TDS (even though the same is reflected in 26as). similarly doesn't give credit to advance tax, self assessment tax paid since for processing ITR under 139(5) or under 154 it gets 3 times the amount given for processing under 139(1). don't know to what extent it's true. nowadays ITD receives lots of these kind of grievances

avater

Malhar Deshpande   24 December 2019

Malhar Deshpande

 4 likes  209 points

View Profile | My Other Post

It has come in ET on 23/12/19 that system at CPS banglore has not considered deduction in respect of LTCG u/s 112A for hundreds of return filiers.

Glitches in ITR processing lead to bloated tax liability on capital gains

This has led to bloated tax liability on capital gains and denial of credit for TDS, among other issues.

By Sugata Ghosh, ET Bureau | Updated: 

ppgopi (QA)     09 February 2020

ppgopi
QA 
 2 likes  59 points

View Profile | My Other Post

Any further updates on this. My case also same. 


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  



Related Threads


Loading

Popular Discussion


view more »



Trending Tags
GST Live Class    |    x