Debate

IN MY VIEW SELF STUDY PERSON IS MORE GREAT.

BUT OTHER MEMBERS MAY HAVE OTHER VIEWS

SELF-STUDY it is... Of course Rank holders cannot be left behind.. But i am sure majority would say Self-study.

Self -study

person who got rank is great.....it cannot b deemed that person getting decent marks through selfstudy could hav got rank,if he/she attended tuition.it require something different to get rank....u cant take credit from a rankholder just because he attended tuition.....as ultimately it depends upon student how he fares in exam nd not on class.

Self - study...........:)

Ofourse Self study student is great....In the same way the ranker who has taken tution is great too...Taking mere tution doesnt make him to get the ranker unless the lecturer makes him go all the way after studies and teach him all the stories and lessons , motivating , classes and all seperately..... Both are great if not something extra ordinary support happen to the rannker.... Thanks & Regards, A.Jayasri

U can't compare both.. because comparision means both r shld be in same catagiry and in same situation...

 

see taking coaching is tuffer than self studying.....because as lord Krishna said... a student can learn only 25 % from the teacher or Guru..

 

why people fail even they r taking in best coaching centre?

 

So both are equally good  because they r rank holders....

 

when a person take coaching there r many aspects.. like go and come back to classes some times he may late so that day his perrsormance is less

these are hidden objects in taking coaching..

self study person may refer many books it doesnt mean he only refer ICAI module

while listening u cant concentrate 100 %

but while studying u can concentrate..

 

u ll have luck also for getting rank because a person who got rank in CPT may not get in IPCC and FINAL

 

A person Who get qualified mark will get rank in next stage