Menu
CARO 2016
whether their is any reporting responsibility of auditors under caro 16 for company's failure to repay public deposit?
Replies (1)
YES AS PER CARO AUDIT REPORT 2016 , THE AUDITOR HAS TO STATE IN ITS AUDIT REPORT THAT WEATHER THE COMPANY WHICH HAS ACCEPTED THE DEPOSITS HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE GUIDLINESS AS STATED IN SECTION 73 TO 76 AND IF NOT THEN OF CONTRAVENTION TO BE STATED AND WEATHER THE ORDER OF NCLT HAS BEEN COMPLED OR NOT . IF THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OR INTREST IS OVERDUE FOR MORE THAN 90 DAYS , THEN THE REASONS FOR SUCH OVERDUE SHALL BE STATED IN THE CARO Report. ALL THE DETAILS RELATING TO ACCEPTANCE AND PAYMENT OF DEPOSITS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE AUDIT REPORT.
Recent Topics :
- GSTR 9 LATE FEE
- Best Online Mock Test Series for CA Inter January
- COST OF IMPROVEMENT
- Pillows and Mattresses
- GST Applicability for Reg. / Un-Reg. Indian custom
- Amended GST Act & Rules
- FAST DS 2026 MAIL QUERY
- Does Anyone need CA Foundation books of May2026 at
- Last day for ITR-U for AY 2023-2024 (FY 2022-2023)
- Sale of shares in indian company by a non resident
Related Topics :
CAclubindia
