Menu
CARO 2016
whether their is any reporting responsibility of auditors under caro 16 for company's failure to repay public deposit?
Replies (1)
YES AS PER CARO AUDIT REPORT 2016 , THE AUDITOR HAS TO STATE IN ITS AUDIT REPORT THAT WEATHER THE COMPANY WHICH HAS ACCEPTED THE DEPOSITS HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE GUIDLINESS AS STATED IN SECTION 73 TO 76 AND IF NOT THEN OF CONTRAVENTION TO BE STATED AND WEATHER THE ORDER OF NCLT HAS BEEN COMPLED OR NOT . IF THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OR INTREST IS OVERDUE FOR MORE THAN 90 DAYS , THEN THE REASONS FOR SUCH OVERDUE SHALL BE STATED IN THE CARO Report. ALL THE DETAILS RELATING TO ACCEPTANCE AND PAYMENT OF DEPOSITS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE AUDIT REPORT.
Recent Topic
- Is CA through direct entry easy for a commerce stu
- Dividend and withholding tax - DTAA- RSU
- NRI Query: Capital Gains Tax Exemption under Secti
- Royalty payment to UK
- Calculate ITR2 tax with equity and non equity prof
- LTCG on residential property sale - Rebate?
- TDS MISMATCH AND AIS
- Return filing for intervening period upto date of
- EPF Withdrawal taxation
- While e filing otp not generating
Related Topics
CAclubindia
