Learner
4016 Points
Joined December 2009
First to Balaji,
Ya Brother in my post above I made a mistake since Capiat Asset in question is "Land' therefore there should have been Sec 54EC & 54F, instead of Sec 54 & 54F ...
Now to G.K.,
Brother, this is not rite Balaji has found a mistake in my post & u have taken it to raise ur query........Ha ha :)) Just kidding,
Regarding ur Query ya it's worth thinking....
But I think if Both L& B are disposed off together even then AO cannot ask to claim Sec 54F "to the extent of gain atttributable to Land' because the rule of interpretation says that "The specific provision shall prevail over the general provision" & in the present case since both L&B has been disosed off together "Sec 54 would be specific to the transaction..
Brother, ur invaluable comments r always welcome.............