CAPITAL BUDGETING
Rahul Bansal
(Finalist)
(35929 Points)
Replied 11 December 2009
Question 1
Nine Gems Ltd. has just installed Machine-R at a cost of Rs. 2,00,000. The machine has a five year life with no residual value. The annual volume of production is estimated at 1,50,000 units, which can be sold at Rs. 6 per unit. Annual operating costs are estimated at Rs. 2,00,000 (excluding depreciation) at this output level. Fixed costs are estimated at Rs. 3 per unit for the same level of production.
Nine Gems Ltd. has just come across another model called Machine-S capable of giving the same output at an annual operating cost of Rs. 1,80,000 (exclusive of depreciation).There will be no change in fixed costs. Capital cost of this machine is Rs. 2,50,000 and the estimated life is for five years with nil residual value.
The company has an offer for sale of Machine-R at Rs. 1,00,000. But the cost of dismantling and removal will amount to Rs. 30,000. As the company has not yet commenced operations, it wants to sell Machine –R and purchase Machine-S.
Nine Gems Ltd. will be a zero-tax company for seven years in view of several incentives and allowances available.
The cost of capital may be assumed at 14%. P.V. factors for five years are as follows:
Year |
P.V. Factors |
1 |
0.877 |
2 |
0.769 |
3 |
0.675 |
4 |
0.592 |
5 |
0.519 |
(i) Advise whether the company should opt for the replacement.
(ii) Will there be any change in your view if Machine-R has not been installed but the company is in the process of selecting one or the other machine?
Support your view with necessary workings.
(Final-Nov. 1996) (12 marks)
Answer
(i) Replacement of Machine –R
Incremental cash out flow
(i) |
Cash out flow on Machine –S |
Rs. 2,50,000 |
|
Less: |
|
|
Less : Cost of dismantling and removal (Rs. 1,00,000-Rs. 30,000) |
Rs. 70,000 |
|
Net outflow |
Rs. 1,80,000 |
|
Incremental cash flow from Machine-S |
|
|
Annual cash flow from Machine –S |
Rs. 2,70,000 |
|
Annual cash flow from Machine –R |
Rs. 2,50,000 |
|
Net incremental Cash in flow |
Rs. 20,000 |
Present value of incremental cash in flows
= Rs. 20,000 ´ (0.877 +0.769+0.675+0.592+0.519)
= 20,000 ´ 3.432 = Rs. 68,640
NPV of Machine -S = Rs. 68,640 – Rs. 1,80,000
= (-) Rs. 1,11,360
Rs. 2,00,000 spent on Machine –R is a sunk cost and hence it is not relevant for deciding the replacement.
Decision: Since Net present value of Machine –S is in the negative, replacement is not advised.
If the company is in the process of selecting one of the two machines, the decision is to be made on the basis of independent evaluation of two machines by comparing their Net-present values.
(ii) Independent evaluation of Machine –R and Machine –S:
|
Machine –R |
Machine –S |
Units produced |
1,50,000 |
1,50,000 |
Selling price per unit (Rs.) |
6 |
6 |
|
9,00,000 |
9,00,000 |
Less: Operating Cost |
|
|
(exclusive of depreciation) |
2,00,000 |
1,80,000 |
Contribution |
7,00,000 |
7,20,000 |
Less: Fixed Cost |
4,50,000 |
4,50,000 |
Annual cash flow |
2,50,000 |
2,70,000 |
Present value of cash flows for five years |
8,58,000 |
9,26,640 |
Cash Outflow |
2,00,000 |
2,50,000 |
Net Present Value |
6,58,000 |
6,76,640 |
As the NPV of cash in flow of Machine –S is higher than that of Machine –R, the choice should fall on machine –S.
Note: As the company is a zero tax company for seven years (Machine life in both cases is only for five years), depreciation and the tax effect on the same are not relevant for consideration.
Rahul Bansal
(Finalist)
(35929 Points)
Replied 11 December 2009
Question 2
(a) Following are the data on a capital project being evaluated by the management of X Ltd.:
|
Project M |
Annual cost saving |
Rs. 40,000 |
Useful life |
4 years |
I.R.R |
15% |
Profitability index (PI) |
1,064 |
NPV |
? |
Cost of capital |
? |
Cost of project |
? |
Payback |
? |
Salvage value
|
0 |
Find the missing values considering the following table of discount factor only:
Discount factor |
15% |
14% |
13% |
12% |
1 Year |
0.869 |
0.877 |
0.885 |
0.893 |
2 Years |
0.756 |
0.769 |
0.783 |
0.797 |
3 Years |
0.658 |
0.675 |
0.693 |
0.712 |
4 Years |
0.572 |
0.592 |
0.613 |
0.636 |
|
2.855 |
2.913 |
2.974 |
3.038 |
(b) S Ltd. has Rs. 10,00,000 allocated for capital budgeting purposes. The following proposals and associated profitability indexes have been determined.
Project |
Amount |
Profitability Index |
1 |
3,00,000 |
1.22 |
2 |
1,50,000 |
0.95 |
3 |
3,50,000 |
1.20 |
4 |
4,50,000 |
1.18 |
5 |
2,00,000 |
1.20 |
6 |
4,00,000 |
1.05 |
Which of the above investments should be undertaken? Assume that projects are indivisible and there is no alternative use of the money allocated for capital budgeting.
(Final-Nov. 1998) (12 + 8 marks)
Answer
(a) Cost of Project M
At 15% I.R.R., the sum total of cash inflows = Cost of the project i.e. Initial cash outlay 11 Given:
Annual cost saving |
Rs. 40,000 |
Useful life |
4 years |
IRR |
15% |
Now, considering the discount factor table @ 15% cumulative present value of cash inflows for 4 years is 2.855
Therefore,
Total of cash inflows for 4 years for Project M is (Rs. 40,000 ´ 2.855) = Rs. 1,14,200
Hence, cost of the project is = Rs. 1,14,200
Payback period of the Project M
Cost of the project Annual cost saving
Rs. 1,14,200 40,000
=
= 2.855 or 2 years 11 months approximately
Cost of Capital
If the profitability index (PI) is 1, cash inflows and outflows would be equal. In this case, (PI) is 1.064. Therefore, cash inflows would be more by 0.64 than outflow.
Discounted cash inflows Cost of the Project
Probability index (PI) =
Discounted cash inflows
Rs. 1,14,200
or 0.064 =
or 1.064 ´ Rs. 1,14,200 = Rs. 1,21,509
Hence discounted cash inflows =Rs. 1,21,509
Since, Annual cost saving is Rs. 40,000. Hence, cumulative discount factor for 4 years
1,21,509 40,000
=
Considering the discount factor table at discount rate of 12%, the cumulative discount factor for 4 years is 3.038
Hence, the cost of capital is 12%
Net present value of the project
N.P.V. = Total present values of cash inflows – Cost of the project
= Rs. 1,21,509 – Rs. 1,14,200
= Rs. 7,309
(b) Statement showing ranking of projects on the basis of Profitability Index
Project |
Amount (Rs.) |
P.I. |
Rank |
1 |
3,00,000 |
1.22 |
1 |
2 |
1,50,000 |
0.95 |
5 |
3 |
3,50,000 |
1.20 |
2 |
4 |
4,50,000 |
1.18 |
3 |
5 |
2,00,000 |
1.20 |
2 |
6 |
4,00,000 |
1.05 |
4 |
Assuming that projects are indivisible and there is no alternative use of the money allocated for capital budgeting on the basis of P.I. , the S Ltd. is advised to undertake investment in projects 1,3 and 5.
However, among the alternative projects the allocation should be made to the projects which adds the most to the shareholders wealth. The NPV method, by its definition, will always select such projects.
Statement showing NPV of the projects
Project (i) |
Amount (Rs.) (ii) |
P.I. (iii) |
Cash inflows of project (Rs.) (iv)=[(ii) ´ (iii)] |
N.P.V. of project (Rs.) (v)=[(iv)-(ii)] |
1 |
3,00,000 |
1.22 |
3,66,000 |
66,000 |
2 |
1,50,000 |
0.95 |
1,42,500 |
(-) 7,500 |
3 |
3,50,000 |
1.20 |
4,20,000 |
70,000 |
4 |
4,50,000 |
1.18 |
5,31,000 |
81,000 |
5 |
2,00,000 |
1.20 |
2,40,000 |
40,000 |
6 |
4,00,000 |
1.05 |
4,20,000 |
20,000 |
The allocation of funds to the projects 1,3 and 5 (as selected above on the basis of PI) will give NPV of Rs. 1,76,000 and Rs. 1,50,000 will remain unspent.
However, the NPV of the projects 3,4 and 5 is Rs. 1,91,000 which is more than the N.P.V. of projects 1,3 and 5. Further, by undertaking projects 3,4 and 5 no money will remain unspent. Therefore, S Ltd. is advised to undertake investments in projects 3,4 and 5.
Rahul Bansal
(Finalist)
(35929 Points)
Replied 11 December 2009
Question 3
A large profit making company is considering the installation of a machine to process the waste produced by one of its existing manufacturing process to be converted into a marketable product. At present, the waste is removed by a contractor for disposal on payment by the company of Rs. 50 lacs per annum for the next four years. The contract can be terminated upon installation of the aforesaid machine on payment of a compensation of Rs. 30 lacs before the processing operation starts. This compensation is not allowed as deduction for tax purposes.
The machine required for carrying out the processing will cost Rs. 200 lacs to be financed by a loan repayable in 4 equal installments commencing from the end of year 1. The interest rate is 16% per annum. At the end of the 4th year, the machine can be sold for Rs. 20 lacs and the cost of dismantling and removal will be Rs. 15 lacs.
Sales and direct costs of the product emerging from waste processing for 4 years are estimated as under:
(Rs. In lacs)
Year |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Sales |
322 |
322 |
418 |
418 |
Material consumption |
30 |
40 |
85 |
85 |
Wages |
75 |
75 |
85 |
100 |
Other expenses |
40 |
45 |
54 |
70 |
Factory overheads |
55 |
60 |
110 |
145 |
Depreciation (as per income tax rules) |
50 |
38 |
28 |
21 |
Initial stock of materials required before commencement of the processing operations is Rs. 20 lacs at the start of year 1. The stock levels of materials to be maintained at the end of year 1, 2 and 3 will be Rs. 55 lacs and the stocks at the end of year 4 will be nil. The storage of materials will utilise space which would otherwise have been rented out for Rs. 10 lacs per annum. Labour costs include wages of 40 workers, whose transfer to this process will reduce idle time payments of Rs. 15 lacs in the year 1 and Rs. 10 lacs in the year 2. Factory overheads include apportionment of general factory overheads except to the extent of insurance charges of Rs. 30 lacs per annum payable on this venture. The company’s tax rate is 50%.
Present value factors for four years are as under:
Year |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Present value factors |
0.870 |
0.756 |
0.658 |
0.572 |
Advise the management on the desirability of installing the machine for processing the waste. All calculations should form part of the answer.
(Final-May 1999) (20 marks)
Answer
Statement of Incremental Profit
(Rs. in lacs)
Years |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Sales :(A) |
322 |
322 |
418 |
418 |
Material consumption |
30 |
40 |
85 |
85 |
Wages |
60 |
65 |
85 |
100 |
Other expenses |
40 |
45 |
54 |
70 |
Factory overheads (insurance) |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
Loss of rent |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
Interest |
32 |
24 |
16 |
8 |
Depreciation (as per income tax rules) |
50 |
38 |
28 |
21 |
Total cost: (B) |
252 |
252 |
308 |
324 |
Incremental profit (C)=(A)-(B) |
70 |
70 |
110 |
94 |
Tax (50% of (C)) |
35 |
35 |
55 |
47 |
Statement of Incremental Cash Flows
(Rs. in lacs)
Years |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Material stocks |
(20) |
(35) |
- |
- |
- |
Compensation for contract |
(30) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Contract payment saved |
- |
50 |
50 |
50 |
50 |
Tax on contract payment |
- |
(25) |
(25) |
(25) |
(25) |
Incremental profit |
- |
70 |
70 |
110 |
94 |
Depreciation added back |
- |
50 |
38 |
28 |
21 |
Tax on profits |
- |
(35) |
(35) |
(55) |
(47) |
Loan repayment |
- |
(50) |
(50) |
(50) |
(50) |
Profit on sale of machinery (net) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
5 |
Total incremental cash flows |
(50) |
25 |
48 |
58 |
48 |
Present value factor |
1.00 |
0.870 |
0.756 |
0.658 |
0.572 |
Net present value of cash flows |
(50) |
21.75 |
36.288 |
38.164 |
27.456 |
Net present value |
= Rs. 123.658 – Rs. 50 = 73.658 lacs. |
|
|
Advice: Since the net present value of cash flows is Rs. 73.658 lacs which is positive the management should install the machine for processing the waste.
Notes:
1. Material stock increases are taken in cash flows.
2. Idle time wages have also been considered
3. Apportioned factory overheads are not relevant only insurance charges of this project are relevant.
4. Interest calculated at 16% based on 4 equal instalments of loan repayment.
5.
6. Saving in contract payment and income tax there on considered in the cash flows.
Rahul Bansal
(Finalist)
(35929 Points)
Replied 11 December 2009
Question 3
A large profit making company is considering the installation of a machine to process the waste produced by one of its existing manufacturing process to be converted into a marketable product. At present, the waste is removed by a contractor for disposal on payment by the company of Rs. 50 lacs per annum for the next four years. The contract can be terminated upon installation of the aforesaid machine on payment of a compensation of Rs. 30 lacs before the processing operation starts. This compensation is not allowed as deduction for tax purposes.
The machine required for carrying out the processing will cost Rs. 200 lacs to be financed by a loan repayable in 4 equal installments commencing from the end of year 1. The interest rate is 16% per annum. At the end of the 4th year, the machine can be sold for Rs. 20 lacs and the cost of dismantling and removal will be Rs. 15 lacs.
Sales and direct costs of the product emerging from waste processing for 4 years are estimated as under:
(Rs. In lacs)
Year |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Sales |
322 |
322 |
418 |
418 |
Material consumption |
30 |
40 |
85 |
85 |
Wages |
75 |
75 |
85 |
100 |
Other expenses |
40 |
45 |
54 |
70 |
Factory overheads |
55 |
60 |
110 |
145 |
Depreciation (as per income tax rules) |
50 |
38 |
28 |
21 |
Initial stock of materials required before commencement of the processing operations is Rs. 20 lacs at the start of year 1. The stock levels of materials to be maintained at the end of year 1, 2 and 3 will be Rs. 55 lacs and the stocks at the end of year 4 will be nil. The storage of materials will utilise space which would otherwise have been rented out for Rs. 10 lacs per annum. Labour costs include wages of 40 workers, whose transfer to this process will reduce idle time payments of Rs. 15 lacs in the year 1 and Rs. 10 lacs in the year 2. Factory overheads include apportionment of general factory overheads except to the extent of insurance charges of Rs. 30 lacs per annum payable on this venture. The company’s tax rate is 50%.
Present value factors for four years are as under:
Year |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Present value factors |
0.870 |
0.756 |
0.658 |
0.572 |
Advise the management on the desirability of installing the machine for processing the waste. All calculations should form part of the answer.
(Final-May 1999) (20 marks)
Answer
Statement of Incremental Profit
(Rs. in lacs)
Years |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Sales :(A) |
322 |
322 |
418 |
418 |
Material consumption |
30 |
40 |
85 |
85 |
Wages |
60 |
65 |
85 |
100 |
Other expenses |
40 |
45 |
54 |
70 |
Factory overheads (insurance) |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
Loss of rent |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
Interest |
32 |
24 |
16 |
8 |
Depreciation (as per income tax rules) |
50 |
38 |
28 |
21 |
Total cost: (B) |
252 |
252 |
308 |
324 |
Incremental profit (C)=(A)-(B) |
70 |
70 |
110 |
94 |
Tax (50% of (C)) |
35 |
35 |
55 |
47 |
Statement of Incremental Cash Flows
(Rs. in lacs)
Years |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Material stocks |
(20) |
(35) |
- |
- |
- |
Compensation for contract |
(30) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Contract payment saved |
- |
50 |
50 |
50 |
50 |
Tax on contract payment |
- |
(25) |
(25) |
(25) |
(25) |
Incremental profit |
- |
70 |
70 |
110 |
94 |
Depreciation added back |
- |
50 |
38 |
28 |
21 |
Tax on profits |
- |
(35) |
(35) |
(55) |
(47) |
Loan repayment |
- |
(50) |
(50) |
(50) |
(50) |
Profit on sale of machinery (net) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
5 |
Total incremental cash flows |
(50) |
25 |
48 |
58 |
48 |
Present value factor |
1.00 |
0.870 |
0.756 |
0.658 |
0.572 |
Net present value of cash flows |
(50) |
21.75 |
36.288 |
38.164 |
27.456 |
Net present value |
= Rs. 123.658 – Rs. 50 = 73.658 lacs. |
|
|
Advice: Since the net present value of cash flows is Rs. 73.658 lacs which is positive the management should install the machine for processing the waste.
Notes:
1. Material stock increases are taken in cash flows.
2. Idle time wages have also been considered
3. Apportioned factory overheads are not relevant only insurance charges of this project are relevant.
4. Interest calculated at 16% based on 4 equal instalments of loan repayment.
5.
6. Saving in contract payment and income tax there on considered in the cash flows.
Rahul Bansal
(Finalist)
(35929 Points)
Replied 20 December 2009
CAPITAL BUDGETING
Rahul Bansal
(Finalist)
(35929 Points)
Replied 20 December 2009
DISCLAIMER:
PLEASE NOTE that users of these files are responsible for checking the accuracy, completeness and/or suitability of all information. I makes no representations, guarantees, or warranties as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of the information provided via this forum. The entire risk as to the use of information on this forum is assumed by you. I shall have no liability to a user, or any other person or entity for any indirect, incidental, special, or consequential damages whatsoever, even if I has been advised of the possibility of such damages, or they are foreseeable.
Umesh S. Goyal
(CA Final Articled Assistant)
(294 Points)
Replied 28 April 2011
Have u copied and pasted it from SD BALA Book
Anyway good job done
thanks
Sathyan Avinash
(Company Secretary)
(136 Points)
Replied 01 October 2012
Thanks mate for the wonderful share.