Quick Summary
The Supreme Court has taken a significant step by issuing a notice to the union government regarding the constitutional validity of anti-profiteering provisions under the Goods and Services Tax (GST). This development comes as a result of a special leave petition filed by detergent manufacturer Excel Rasayan Private Ltd challenging the order of the Delhi High Court upholding the validity of these provisions. Background A three-judge bench comprising Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, Justice J
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free News
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
- No Ads
- WhatsApp Community
- Daily E-Newsletter
- Unlimited News Access
- Profile Visitors
- Link Social Profiles
- Featured Job Posts
- Pro Badge
- Expert GST Guidance
- Unlimited Forum Replies
- Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN - Rs.1999
1799
(Excl. of GST ₹323)
2 Years PLAN - Rs.3499
3149
(Excl. of GST ₹566)
BEST VALUE
3 Years PLAN - Rs.4999
4499
(Excl. of GST ₹809)
View all CCI PRO benefits
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience. 07941056694
FAQ :
The Supreme Court has issued a notice to the Central Government regarding the constitutional validity of GST anti-profiteering provisions.
The petition was filed by detergent manufacturer Excel Rasayan Private Ltd.
The petitioner argues that the provisions are unconstitutional because they lack a time limit and a clear methodology, making them arbitrary and difficult for businesses to comply with.
The NAA was established to ensure that companies pass on the benefits of input tax credit (ITC) and GST reductions to consumers by lowering prices.
The Delhi High Court had previously upheld the validity of the anti-profiteering provisions, ruling against establishing a fixed formula for determining anti-profiteering.
Yes, over 100 companies, including major brands, had filed petitions against the anti-profiteering provisions in the High Court.
CAclubindia
