Quick Summary
The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking to declare the Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) system as "manifestly arbitrary, irrational, and violative of fundamental rights." The PIL, filed by advocate Ashwini Upadhyay, contended that the current TDS framework infringes on constitutional rights, including the right to equality. SC Labels Plea 'Badly Drafted,' Suggests Delhi High Court Route While rejecting the petition, Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Kh
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free News
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
- No Ads
- WhatsApp Community
- Daily E-Newsletter
- Unlimited News Access
- Profile Visitors
- Link Social Profiles
- Featured Job Posts
- Pro Badge
- Expert GST Guidance
- Unlimited Forum Replies
- Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN
1999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)
2 Years PLAN
3499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)
BEST VALUE
3 Years PLAN
4999
(Excl. of GST ₹899)
View all CCI PRO benefits
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience. 07941056694
FAQ :
The Supreme Court dismissed the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that challenged the Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) system.
The Supreme Court dismissed the petition because it was considered 'very badly drafted'.
The Supreme Court suggested that the petitioner could move the Delhi High Court with their challenge.
The TDS system is a mechanism to ensure a steady flow of revenue to the government and reduce tax evasion by collecting taxes at the point of income generation.
No, the court noted that the TDS mechanism is a widely accepted practice across several countries.
CAclubindia
