Court :
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Brief :
Whether a manufacturer is required to reverse/pay the amount equivalent to the CENVET credit taken by him in respect of inputs which are proved to have been used in the manufacture of goods which have been cleared under exemption from excise duty, in view of the specific provisions of Rule 6(1) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 (now 2004) read with Explanation II to Rule 6 (3) of the said rules which provide that no credit can be taken in respect of inputs which are used in the manufacture of exempted goods?
Citation :
Commissioner, Central Excise Chandigarh, Central Revenue
Building, Plot No. 19, Sector-17C, Chandigarh-1 ........Appellant Versus M/s Ansysco, Plot No. 19 F, Sector-2, Parwanoo, District Solan (HP), through its General Manager .......Respondent
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
Sri Aurobindo Gnostic Centre of Education
New Delhi
CA
View Details
T R SOOD & CO
New Delhi
CA Inter
View Details
Karia Overseas
Ahmedabad
CA
View Details
SSGS and Associates
Chennai
CA Inter
View Details
CAclubindia
