Court :
igh Court, Chhattisgarh
Brief :
The Hon’ble High Court of Chhattisgarh after discussing provisions under Section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994 (“the Finance Act”) read with Rule 5 of the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 (“the Valuation Rules”), upheld the Order of the Hon’ble Tribunal holding that Primary claim/ Retailer scheme is the amount which the service provider (i.e. the Assessee) had given to the retailers on behalf of SBL for achieving certain quota of sales for which they were reimbursed by SBL as a pure agent. Accordingly, the said amount would be dealt in view of Rule 5(2) of the Valuation Rules which provides exclusion of expenditure or cost incurred by the service provider as the pure agent.
Citation :
Union of India Vs. Raj Wines [(2015) 53 taxmann.com 445 (Chhattisgarh)]
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
SMJ global advisors pvt ltd
New Delhi
B.Com
View Details
Vardhaman Group of India
Pimpri Chinchwad
CA Inter
View Details
Rahul Dang & Associates-Chartered Accountants
Pune
CA Inter
View Details
T R SOOD & CO
New Delhi
CA Inter
View Details
CAclubindia
