Smt. G.P. Lakshmi, Bangalore Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward- 1(2)(4), Bangalore


Last updated: 29 October 2020

Court :
ITAT Bangalore

Brief :
This appeal is filed by the assessee and the is directed against the order of CIT (A) – 1 Bengaluru dated 24.07.2019.

Citation :
ITA Nos. 1956/Bang/2019

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
“C” BENCH : BANGALORE

BEFORE SHRI N. V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND
SHRI A. K. GARODIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

ITA Nos. 1956/Bang/2019
Assessment year : 2015 – 16

Smt. G. P. Lakshmi,N. 16, 13th Cross, Jaymahal Extension,Bangalore– 560046,PAN : AQYPP2561K
APPELLANT 
Vs.
ITO Ward – 1 (2) (4),Bengaluru
RESPONDENT

Assessee by : Shree Sandip, C. A.
Revenue by : Smt. R. Premi, JCIT DR
Date of hearing : 21.10.2020
Date of Pronouncement : 22.10.2020

O R D E R

PER ARUN KUMAR GARODIA, A. M.:

This appeal is filed by the assessee and the is directed against the order of CIT (A) – 1 Bengaluru dated 24.07.2019.

2. In course of hearing, learned AR of the assessee sought adjournment which was rejected because the bench noted that the order of CIT (A) is ex parte qua the assessee and as per this order, and as per this order, learned CIT (A) has not decided the appeal on merit and he has dismissed the appeal of the assessee in limine by following the tribunal order rendered in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India Ltd., 38 ITD 320. And this is settled position by now that even if the assessee has not appeared, the appeal should be decided on merit and therefore, this matter has to be remanded to CIT (A) for a decision on merit after providing adequate opportunity of being heard to both sides.Learned AR of the assessee agreed to this proposition put forward by the bench. Learned DR of the revenue although supported the order of CIT (A) but she also did not have any serious objection to this proposition put forward by the bench.

3. In view of above discussion, we set aside the order of CIT (A) and remand the entire matter to CIT (A) for a decision on merit after providing adequate opportunity of being heard to both sides. In view of this decision, no adjudication on merit is called for at the present stage.

4. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.Pronounced in the open court on the date mentioned on the caption page.

Sd/-                                                                                                                                                       Sd/-
(N. V. VASUDEVAN)                                                                                                                             (A.K. GARODIA)
Vice President                                                                                                                                       Accountant Member
Bangalore,
Dated: 22nd October, 2020.

Copy to:
1. Appellants 
2. Respondent
3. CIT
4. CIT(A)                
5. DR, ITAT, Bangalore. 
6. Guard file

By order
Assistant Registrar,
ITAT, Bangalore.
 

 

CCI Pro

Guest
Published in Income Tax
Views : 83

Comments

CAclubindia's WhatsApp Groups Link



CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news



Company
Featured 28 March 2026
CA Final

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 14 March 2026
Article Trainee

N N V Satish&co

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 19 March 2026
Article Assistant

Gupta Sachdeva & Co. Chartered Accountants

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
Accountant

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 14 April 2026
GST CONSULTANT

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 13 April 2026
GST CONSULTANCY

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 14 March 2026
Associate CA

N N V Satish&co

Hyderabad

CA

View Details