Section 54F of the Income-tax Act, 1961


Court :
IN THE ITAT MUMBAI BENCH ‘A’

Brief :
Section 54F of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Capital gains - Exemption of, in case of investment in residential house - Assessment years 1997-98 and 1998-99 - Assessing Officer denied exemption under section 54F on ground that assessee was in possession of a plot of land wherein a farm-house existed and as farm-house was a residential house, benefit of section 54F was not available to assessee - It was found from record that said piece of land was an agricultural plot consisting of huts and out-houses, which in turn were being used as cattle sheds and said huts were in a dilapidated condition and had never been used or occupied by assessee - Whether it could not be said that assessee was owner of another residential house - Held, yes - Whether therefore, assessee was eligible for exemption under section 54F - Held, yes During the previous year, the assessee had sold the shares held by her and claimed the capital gains arising on the sale of the shares to be exempt by availing the benefit under section 54F on account of investment in a residential property. The Assessing Officer denied the exemption on the ground that the assessee was in possession of a plot of land wherein a farm-house existed and as the farm-house was a residential house, the benefit of section 54F was not available to the assessee. On appeal, the assessee contended that no farm-house or any other house existed on said plot of land and that land was leased to Punjab State Electricity Board (PSEB) and certain residential buildings had been put up by the PSEB for its staff quarters. The Commissioner (Appeals) directed the Assessing Officer that on-site verification should be carried out to re-examine the matter after considering the evidence produced by the assessee and also the lease agreement with PSEB. In the second round of assessment, no on-site verification was carried out by the Assessing Officer and he again rejected the claim of the assessee for exemption under section 54F. On appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the assessee’s claim for exemption under section 54F. On revenue’s appeal :

Citation :
Income-tax Officer, Ward 16(2)-1, Mumbai v. Smt. Anjali Mehra

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Community
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
  • Profile Visitors
  • Link Social Profiles
  • Featured Job Posts
  • Pro Badge
  • Expert GST Guidance
  • Unlimited Forum Replies
  • Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN - Rs.1999
1799
(Excl. of GST ₹323)

2 Years PLAN - Rs.3499
3149
(Excl. of GST ₹566)

BEST VALUE
3 Years PLAN - Rs.4999
4499
(Excl. of GST ₹809)

View all CCI PRO benefits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience. 07941056694

 



Judgement posted by

Consultant

Comments




CCI Pro



Company
16 October 2026
CA article trainee

Zerdi & Co. Chartered Accountants

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
14 October 2026
Accountant

Rize.farm

Bengaluru

B.Com

View Details
Company
13 October 2026
Accountant

Zerdi & Co. Chartered Accountants

Pune

B.Com

View Details
Company
10 October 2026
Accounts Associate Level 1

Abic and Mani Chartered Accountants

Kottayam

B.Com

View Details
Company
19 October 2026
Accountants/Articles (Freshers/Experienced)

ADY & CO.

New Delhi

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
Featured ARTICLESHIP 28 October 2026
CA- Inter and Articles

N N V Satish & Co.,

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 29 October 2026
Accounts Executive

Synergy Keystone

Chennai

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 29 October 2026
Article Assistant (CA Inter / CMA Inter) - Thrissur

Varma Raja & Associates

Thrissur

CA Inter

View Details