Sandeep Kumar Achantani opted to settle the dispute through Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.

Last updated: 19 January 2021

Court :
ITAT New Delhi

Brief :
The assessee has filed the present appeal against the impugned orderdated 20.05.2019 passed by learned CIT(A), New Delhi relating to the assessment year 2011-12.

Citation :
ITA No. 5980/DEL/2019

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCH “SMC-1” NEW DELHI
(THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING)

BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER

ITA No. 5980/DEL/2019
A.Y.: 2011-12

Sandeep Kumar Achantani,
24/1, Emilia-4, 1st Floor,
(PAN:AAAPA1450A)
(Appellant)

vs.

ITO, Ward-12(1),
Vatika City, Sector-49, New Delhi
Gurgaon, Haryana
(Respondent)

Assessee by : Sh. Atul Mathur, CA
Department b : Sh. Prakash Dubey, Sr. DR

O R D E R

The assessee has filed the present appeal against the impugned orderdated 20.05.2019 passed by learned CIT(A), New Delhi relating to the assessment year 2011-12.

2. At the time of hearing learned counsel for the assessee filed anapplication dated 28th December, 2020 and stated that assessee have opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 and Rules for withdrawal of the subjectappeal. He has further stated that assessee has already made payment of tax due as required in Form No. 3.

2. Learned Sr. DR has not raised any objection.

3. Keeping in view the statement of the learned counsel for the assessee, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the assessee to move an application for recalling of this order and that will be decided as per law.

4. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the Open Court today i.e. on 28.12.2020 in the presence of both the parties.

Sd/ -
[H.S. SIDHU]
JUDICIAL MEMBER

Date: 28.12.2020
Copy forwarded to: -

1. Appellant -
2. Respondent -
3. CIT
4. CIT (A)
5. DR, ITAT

TRUE COPY

By Order,
Assistant Registrar,
ITAT, Delhi Benches