REVISION
Last updated: 03 September 2007
Court :
Tribunal
Brief :
A.O can not be termed as erroneous simply on the basis of an opinion which is framed in the mind of the Commissioner that the conclusion is prejudicial to the interest of revenue unless there is adequate proof for that.
Citation :
T.K.International Ltd Vs. A.C.I.T
Revision
T.K.International Ltd Vs. A.C.I.T 30/07/2004
(2005)275 ITR 101( I.T.A.T - Cuttack Bench)
Case Fact: Whether mere opinion of the commissioner that the order is prejudicial to the interest of revenue leads to revision of the order passed by A.O.
Decision: Held by the Tribunal that,the conclusion of the A.O can not be termed as erroneous simply on the basis of an opinion which is framed in the mind of the Commissioner that the conclusion is prejudicial to the interest of revenue unless there is adequate proof for that.
CA.Saibaburao Nanduri
Published in Income Tax
Views : 50
Comments
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
