Relief should not be granted if contrary to Rule 10 of CAT Procedure Rule

Last updated: 26 November 2011

Court :
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

Brief :
This W.P. is filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated 21.07.2008 passed by the CAT in O.A.No 55/2007 After arguing the matter at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submit that O.A. No 55/2007 filed by the Centeral Administrative Tribunal was dismissed on 21.07.2008 on the ground that petitioner has sought the relief contrary to Rule 10of CAT (Procedure) Rule. He requested the Court permit him to approach the Tribunal by filling review petition.

Citation :
R. Sankarankutty S/O Late T N Raman Nair ....Petitioner And The Controller and Auditor General of India ....Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORS

DATED THIS THE 3^RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2011

PRESENT

THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE K L MANJUNATH

AND

THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE MANOHAR

W.P.No 11133/2008 (S-CAT)

BETWEEN

R. Sankarankutty

S/O Late T N Raman Nair ………..Petitioner

And

The Controller and Auditor General of India ……..Respondent

This W.P. is filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated 21.07.2008 passed by the CAT in O.A.No 55/2007 Annexure – A

This W.P. coming on for hearing this day K. L. Manjurath J., passed the following :-

ORDER

After arguing the matter at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submit that O.A. No 55/2007 filed by the Centeral Administrative Tribunal was dismissed on 21.07.2008 on the ground that petitioner has sought the relief contrary to Rule 10of CAT (Procedure) Rule. He requested the Court permit him to approach the Tribunal by filling review petition.

Please check the detail Judgment in the attached file.