Court :
cestat, mumbai bench
Brief :
The appellant-assessee was engaged in providing business auxiliary services and export of said services. It was availing benefit of the Cenvat credit in respect of input services used by it in the export of auxiliary services. Since it was unable to utilize the said credit for the relevant period, it claimed refund according to substituted rule 5 amended with effect from 14-3-2006. the adjudicating authority rejected the claim on the ground that rule 5 prior to its substitution did not provide for refund of unutilized credit to the provider of output services
Citation :
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
Aggarwal Sarawagi and Co
New Delhi
CA
View Details
CAclubindia
